Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standardize on redhat.satellite Collection #15

Open
jjaswanson4 opened this issue Sep 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

Standardize on redhat.satellite Collection #15

jjaswanson4 opened this issue Sep 29, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested triaged This issue has been acknowledged and reviewed by core team

Comments

@jjaswanson4
Copy link
Contributor

Leverage the official redhat.satellite ansible collection as opposed to theforeman.foreman collection

@bherrin3
Copy link
Collaborator

@ehelms @jjaswanson4

Would this not fall into the typical upstream / downstream conundrum?

Therefore, I would like to humbly ask...

image

@kedark3 kedark3 added question Further information is requested triaged This issue has been acknowledged and reviewed by core team labels Oct 30, 2020
@ehelms
Copy link
Member

ehelms commented Oct 30, 2020

I think it's generally fair for things in here to reference the official Satellite collection. But I will add there are ways to write it generically and reference the particular collection at a higher level (e.g. specified in a playbook). The upstream collection roles are hard typed to the upstream collection(https://github.com/theforeman/foreman-ansible-modules/blob/develop/roles/manifest/tasks/main.yml) but @evgeni has a plan for how that will translate when they get released in the Satellite collection.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested triaged This issue has been acknowledged and reviewed by core team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants