-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is x-tags supposed to be implemented? #2148
Comments
This was answered by @adamaltman in Redocly/redocly-cli#838. Apparently this is in the premium product only. |
Let's leave this open here so we can discuss implementing it in Redoc. |
Let's implement it. cc @AlexVarchuk |
Have you any idea of when it will be available? I'm trying to evaluate options / appropriate workaround effort. |
This feature has been merged now (thanks @AlexVarchuk !), so you'll find it on the main branch. It will be in Redoc itself at the next release. |
Describe the problem to be solved
Implement x-tags as documented already: x-tags
In testing we've found it not to work and the README does not list it as an extension (so I assume it's not actually been implemented?):
https://github.com/Redocly/redoc#openapi-specification-extensions
Describe the solution you'd like
As documented.
Describe alternatives you've considered
We're using
<SchemaDefinition>
but then when used with redocly it triggers theno-unused-components
inspection rule.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: