Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create a release of current RIM #16

Closed
joewheaton opened this issue Jan 7, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

Create a release of current RIM #16

joewheaton opened this issue Jan 7, 2022 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@joewheaton
Copy link
Contributor

@jtgilbert we need to as part of #1 get a release of @kbartelt code posted here. Lets zip up the deployable part, and make a release (we'll call it 1.0) and then record a video of how to deploy and apply it that we add in documentation.

Then we'll work on RIM 2.0 in QRiS with @nick4rivers.

@joewheaton joewheaton added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 7, 2022
@jtgilbert
Copy link
Collaborator

@joewheaton I think I need to be made co-owner of the repo to draft releases.

@kbartelt
Copy link
Contributor

kbartelt commented Jan 10, 2022

@jtgilbert I just made you an admin for this repo (I didn't see an owner option). Let me know if that didn't work or if you still don't have the necessary access for edits, releases, etc.

@jtgilbert
Copy link
Collaborator

Yep that worked, thanks @kbartelt

@jtgilbert
Copy link
Collaborator

@joewheaton to create a functional release from the scripts as is would take a bit of cleaning up. Right now it doesn't produce project.rs.xml files automatically in the right format to work with the business logic in RAVE. There area also a few missing files required by imports, unused import statements etc. Cashe mentioned that Tyler forked the repo and developed a Python toolbox using these scripts. I haven't tested it but what would you suggest is the best path for a 1.0 release?

@kbartelt
Copy link
Contributor

@jtgilbert I think Tyler's version fixed the XML issue and cleaned up at least some of my extraneous/ messy code and helped with a few things I had wanted to change in the code but didn't know how to. I meant to merge his branch with the master to keep the improvements he made but never actually did. That branch is definitely the one to use- sorry I forgot to mention this sooner.

@jtgilbert
Copy link
Collaborator

@kbartelt Awesome, good to know!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants