Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Polaris test results #5

Open
Bathmat opened this issue Aug 11, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Polaris test results #5

Bathmat opened this issue Aug 11, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@Bathmat
Copy link

Bathmat commented Aug 11, 2019

Here are my initial results testing on a few RX470/570/480/580 gpus:

System 1:

OS: Win10 1903
CPU: i3-7350k
Driver: 19.5.2

System 2:

OS: Win10 1903
CPU: e5-2360L
Driver: 18.5.1

GPUs:
Various RX470/570/480/580 all with 4GB mem. Clocks varied in a range from 1150-1250 for core and 1900-2100 for mem. Voltage varied from 875mV to 950mV

CN/R hashrate:
RX470/570 ~930-950h/s (typical range, extremes down to 880h/s, up to 980h/s)
RX480/580 ~960-1000h/s
GPU only power varies from 65W to 80W (depending on the gpu)

EDIT: CN/R hashrates and power were using TeamRedMiner. XMRig-AMD hashrates are 3-5% slower and power use is 5-10% higher.

RandomX hashrate:
RX470/570: 400-410 h/s
RX480/580: 470h/s
GPU only power was around 50-60W

Results were achieved using: --intensity 832 without --dataset_host.
--dataset_host results in much lower hashrate on riser gpus (260 h/s)

@Bathmat
Copy link
Author

Bathmat commented Aug 11, 2019

RX580 8GB results: 400-440 h/s
Tried several intensity values, but didn't seem to change hashrate (even though mem usage increased as intensity increased). (18.6.1 drivers)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant