Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Error with set_provider_items #701

Closed
2 tasks done
ghost opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Error with set_provider_items #701

ghost opened this issue Dec 21, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Dec 21, 2024 •
edited by ghost
Loading

Make sure you have done the following

  • I have updated to the latest version of blink.cmp
  • I have read the README

Bug Description

image
after update i get following error related to fuzzy

Relevant configuration

sources = {
  default = { "lsp", "path", "luasnip", "buffer" }
},

neovim version

NVIM v0.10.2 Build type: Release LuaJIT 2.1.1713773202

blink.cmp version: branch, tag, or commit

v0.8.0
@ghost ghost added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 21, 2024
@Saghen
Copy link
Owner

Saghen commented Dec 21, 2024 •
edited
Loading

A re-install should fix the issue. I'm hopeful that the changes to the downloader in this version will fix updating to future versions

Duplicate of #68

@Saghen Saghen closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Dec 21, 2024
@olimorris
Copy link

Can confirm a reinstall worked for me.

@Saghen
Copy link
Owner

Saghen commented Dec 22, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Did you happen to build locally with cargo build --release at any point? @olimorris

@olimorris
Copy link

Sorry should have been specific. That's exactly what I did.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@olimorris @Saghen