Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

template 3.0.0 possibly add prot- folder for protocol type #98

Open
tgbugs opened this issue Apr 22, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

template 3.0.0 possibly add prot- folder for protocol type #98

tgbugs opened this issue Apr 22, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@tgbugs
Copy link
Collaborator

tgbugs commented Apr 22, 2023

may need a protocols- folder OR we may need a way to extend dataset_description related identifiers to allow a local name for the protocol, because we do need some accounting in metadata, OR only make protocols.xlsx required when a prot- folder is present ...

in combination with the updates to the manifest to allow mapping of spec- perf- and site- to a given file it seems reasonable to allow top level prot- folders, however we need to explore what other restrictions need to be placed on where and how it can be used

initial thinking is that if we require that prot- folders be unique then they can only appear at the top level of a hierarchy and cannot appear per subject, inside an individual subject a perf- should be used if such nesting is desired, if prot- folders do not have to be unique then we need work out the implications of how they would have to be interpreted

@tgbugs
Copy link
Collaborator Author

tgbugs commented Oct 20, 2023

What do we do if multiple version of a protocol are used to collect data in the prot- folder?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant