Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci: standardise workflows using SciML's reusable workflows #153

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 1, 2024

Conversation

thazhemadam
Copy link
Member

Update the workflows in this repository to use SciML's reusable workflows.
This is part of a larger effort to standardise the SciML's CI workflows for more generic and common requirements, to keep the workflows uniform and easier to maintain.

@thazhemadam thazhemadam force-pushed the at/use-reusable-workflows branch from b4addfa to 4dded87 Compare April 30, 2024 15:28
@thazhemadam thazhemadam force-pushed the at/use-reusable-workflows branch from 4dded87 to 33d56d8 Compare April 30, 2024 15:46
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 30, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.11%. Comparing base (47bcaa9) to head (33d56d8).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #153   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.11%   94.11%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines         204      204           
=======================================
  Hits          192      192           
  Misses         12       12           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 7bf3127 into main May 1, 2024
10 checks passed
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the at/use-reusable-workflows branch May 1, 2024 05:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants