You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I want to make it more clear to users that in some cases, using natsort directly with the default number_type value can give unexpected results when sorting version numbers. To achieve this, I would like to introduce a versorted function which will be a wrapper for natsorted(..., number_type=None, signed=False, noexp=True). This has the added benefit of being less typing for the common use case of sorting version numbers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I want to make it more clear to users that in some cases, using
natsort
directly with the defaultnumber_type
value can give unexpected results when sorting version numbers. To achieve this, I would like to introduce aversorted
function which will be a wrapper fornatsorted(..., number_type=None, signed=False, noexp=True)
. This has the added benefit of being less typing for the common use case of sorting version numbers.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: