Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

best assembler for the job? #8

Open
lskatz opened this issue Feb 27, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

best assembler for the job? #8

lskatz opened this issue Feb 27, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@lskatz
Copy link

lskatz commented Feb 27, 2017

Hi, I was wondering what assembler the authors recommend before running Recycler. It seems like spades is recommended, but then I was also wondering what parameters you would recommend. Is there some set of parameters that, even though it might be worse for the chromosome, might be better for discovering the plasmid?

Also: Would you also recommend running spades with --plasmid as input for Recycler?

@rozovr
Copy link
Collaborator

rozovr commented Feb 27, 2017

For isolates, all our testing was done with default parameters of spades. For metagenomes, especially large ones, I would currently recommend Megahit. Again, we didn't use special parameters. I think both are less sensitive to parameter choices in that use multiple k values by default.

Regarding the --plasmid flag of spades, it was introduced after development of Recycler, so we haven't tested it. It's an interesting question though; what that flag does is turn on the plasmidSpades pipeline, which is supposed to pare down the assembly graph to get rid of chromosomal fragments. It's possible Recycler might do a better job with this simplified graph as input, but it's not clear what this paring process does to coverage values, which Recycler depends on. I'd say it's worth a try!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants