You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi there, I see that the best reported accuracy for this repo for the MR dataset is 77.5% using CNN-rand-static. When I run this, using ./main.py -device=0 -static, I get much lower numbers (~70%). Two questions:
What training settings are you using to get 77.5%?
How are you evaluating on the MR dataset to get 77.5%?
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there, I see that the best reported accuracy for this repo for the MR dataset is 77.5% using CNN-rand-static. When I run this, using ./main.py -device=0 -static, I get much lower numbers (~70%). Two questions:
What training settings are you using to get 77.5%?
How are you evaluating on the MR dataset to get 77.5%?
Hi there, I see that the best reported accuracy for this repo for the MR dataset is 77.5% using CNN-rand-static. When I run this, using
./main.py -device=0 -static
, I get much lower numbers (~70%). Two questions:Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: