Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update blablacar/redis-client from v1.0.10 to v1.0.12 #1

Conversation

violinist-bot
Copy link

If you have a high test coverage index, and your tests for this pull request are passing, it should be both safe and recommended to merge this update.

Here is a list of changes between the version you use, and the version this pull request updates to:


This is an automated pull request from Violinist: Continuously and automatically monitor and update your composer dependencies. Have ideas on how to improve this message? All violinist messages are open-source, and can be improved here.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 20, 2020

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@493e127). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #1   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage          ?   0.00%           
  Complexity        ?     531           
========================================
  Files             ?     112           
  Lines             ?    1758           
  Branches          ?       0           
========================================
  Hits              ?       0           
  Misses            ?    1758           
  Partials          ?       0           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 493e127...71f81bc. Read the comment docs.

@violinist-bot violinist-bot force-pushed the blablacarredisclientv1010v1012 branch 9 times, most recently from abb8f3f to 49f0b52 Compare May 29, 2020 04:32
@truls1502
Copy link
Member

This will now be closed, since it has been superseded by #28.

@truls1502 truls1502 closed this Oct 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants