Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Evaluate on the GRAB dataset #6

Open
mengqing0312 opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 9 comments
Open

Evaluate on the GRAB dataset #6

mengqing0312 opened this issue Nov 2, 2023 · 9 comments

Comments

@mengqing0312
Copy link

Thank you for your excellent work and open sourcing it, I was wondering if you will make public the code that was tested on the GRAB dataset?

@Sirui-Xu
Copy link
Owner

Sirui-Xu commented Nov 3, 2023

Hello,

We will eventually release everything including the evaluation on the GRAB dataset. However, due to scheduling conflicts, we may not be able to release it this month. Sorry for the delay.

Best

@Steve-Tod
Copy link

Steve-Tod commented Nov 11, 2023

Hi @Sirui-Xu ,

It seems GRAB data uses SMPL-X instead of SMPL-H used in BEHAVE. Did you transfer them from SMPL-X to SMPL-H using this?

Thank you!

@Sirui-Xu
Copy link
Owner

Hi @Steve-Tod ,

We do not use this transformation. We copy the body pose directly from the SMPL-H model to the SMPL-X model. However, for the hand and head pose, the approach was to maintain the poses from the last known frame of the previous motion sequence. I will check the details with my collaborator.

This was adopted because the BEHAVE dataset, which was used for training, does not provide detailed hand pose data, as noted in xiexh20/behave-dataset#14. Consequently, the system does not actively generate hand poses. When using the GRAB dataset for evaluation, the primary focus is on the accuracy of the predicted hand joint positions rather than the intricacies of the hand's grasping motions.

Best

@Steve-Tod
Copy link

Hi @Sirui-Xu ,

Thanks for the reply! I'll try it out.

@Steve-Tod
Copy link

Hi @Sirui-Xu ,

Sorry to interrupt again. I tried re-enacting the SMPL-X parameters from GRAB to SMPL+H models used in InterDiff, however there's a small gap between the mesh vertices from the SMPL-X model and the vertices from SMPL+H model. Like in the following, the one contacting with the object is the mesh vertices from SMPL-X while the one a little bit off is the mesh vertices from SMPL+H.

image

Did you do any special processing to align these two? Thank you in advance!

@Sirui-Xu
Copy link
Owner

Hi @Steve-Tod ,

That's interesting. We don't have any special programs as I recall. The evaluation on GRAB was done by my co-author, let me check with him. Will get back to you shortly.

Best

@Steve-Tod
Copy link

Hi @Steve-Tod ,

That's interesting. We don't have any special programs as I recall. The evaluation on GRAB was done by my co-author, let me check with him. Will get back to you shortly.

Best

Sure, thank you!

@Steve-Tod
Copy link

Hi @Sirui-Xu ,

Thanks! I'll give it a try!

@z050209
Copy link

z050209 commented Jan 12, 2024

@Steve-Tod were you able to evaluate the GRAB dataset using this pipeline, possible to share the script?

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants