-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 427
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Add fully_qualified_name to all resources #2990
Conversation
Integration tests failure for d92d1a34e70db7a1eb0d0a9ff0584ffbdb2bbd6e |
️✅ There are no secrets present in this pull request anymore.If these secrets were true positive and are still valid, we highly recommend you to revoke them. 🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request. |
Integration tests failure for 09183d0604a260e5a2be3d0363f8b028f3fdea2a |
Integration tests failure for 713b060ad04d8b88b12e02ab818b5588d673f3eb |
examples/resources/snowflake_grant_privileges_to_account_role/resource.tf
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
examples/resources/snowflake_grant_privileges_to_database_role/resource.tf
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Integration tests cancelled for 167f51c4ffc678d7c81a992c861fe0a27553580b |
Integration tests failure for d3a7c066ba5286971c7ba6c2e7e98d35580df3c7 |
Integration tests failure for fc97d842554df7381c5e5b4ed5a2755d6b7920ad |
Integration tests failure for 8805d1946a4afe605e2ef6fa3248dbdc0635e5c7 |
Integration tests failure for 1115344c1ed3a30a75286886d2a8df62ff3072b3 |
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ import ( | |||
"github.com/hashicorp/terraform-plugin-sdk/v2/helper/schema" | |||
) | |||
|
|||
const FullyQualifiedNameAttributeName = "fully_qualified_name" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we have now multiple places with common attribute names, maybe we should have common_attribute_names.go or something like this?
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [0.95.0](v0.94.1...v0.95.0) (2024-09-04) ### 🎉 **What's new:** * Add change_tracking, row access policy and aggregation policy to views ([#2988](#2988)) ([1f88bb1](1f88bb1)) * Add fully_qualified_name to all resources ([#2990](#2990)) ([1b0462f](1b0462f)) * Add identifier parsers ([#2957](#2957)) ([824ec52](824ec52)) * Add identifier with arguments ([#2979](#2979)) ([00ae1c5](00ae1c5)) * Add timeouts block to cortex ([#3004](#3004)) ([34d764b](34d764b)) * Add user parameters to resource ([#2968](#2968)) ([f4ae380](f4ae380)) * Conclude user rework ([#3036](#3036)) ([23e4625](23e4625)) * database role v1 readiness ([#3014](#3014)) ([c4db255](c4db255)) * Identifier with arguments for procedure and external function ([#2987](#2987)) ([f13cc5c](f13cc5c)) * Rework user resource ([#3026](#3026)) ([bde2638](bde2638)), closes [#1572](#1572) * Rework users datasource ([#3030](#3030)) ([751239b](751239b)), closes [#2902](#2902) * Upgrade view sdk ([#2969](#2969)) ([ef2d50a](ef2d50a)) * View rework part 2 ([#3021](#3021)) ([e05377d](e05377d)) * View rework part 3 ([#3023](#3023)) ([195b41c](195b41c)) ### 🔧 **Misc** * Add annotation about fully_qualified_name and fix handling granteeName ([#3009](#3009)) ([94e6345](94e6345)) * Apply identifier conventions ([#2996](#2996)) ([5cbea84](5cbea84)) * apply identifier conventions to grants ([#3008](#3008)) ([d7780ae](d7780ae)) * Clean collection utils ([#3028](#3028)) ([426ddb1](426ddb1)) * Clean old assertions ([#3029](#3029)) ([ad657eb](ad657eb)) * Conclude identifiers rework ([#3011](#3011)) ([c1b53f3](c1b53f3)) * Improve user test and add manual test for user default database and role ([#3035](#3035)) ([6cb0b4e](6cb0b4e)) * Use new identifier with arguments in function, external function and procedure grants ([#3002](#3002)) ([5053f8b](5053f8b)) * User improvements ([#3034](#3034)) ([65b64d7](65b64d7)) ### 🐛 **Bug fixes:** * database tests and introduce a new parameter ([#2981](#2981)) ([3bae7f6](3bae7f6)) * Fix custom diffs for fields with diff supression ([#3032](#3032)) ([2499602](2499602)) * Fix default secondary roles after BCR 2024_07 ([#3040](#3040)) ([2ca465a](2ca465a)), closes [#3038](#3038) * Fix issues 2972 and 3007 ([#3020](#3020)) ([1772387](1772387)) * Fix known user resource issues ([#3013](#3013)) ([a5dfeac](a5dfeac)) * identifier issues ([#2998](#2998)) ([6fb76b7](6fb76b7)) * minor issues ([#3027](#3027)) ([467b06e](467b06e)), closes [#3015](#3015) [#2807](#2807) [#3025](#3025) * Nuke users ([#2971](#2971)) ([0d90cc9](0d90cc9)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: snowflake-release-please[bot] <105954990+snowflake-release-please[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
fully_qualified_name
to relevent resourcesqualified_name
already, so this field was removed in favor of the new one, with proper state migrators and acceptance testsTest Plan
References