Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Answer Engine]For code references, when the file content is reasonble(e.g <200 LoC), include whole file content directly, instead of only including the chunk. #3096

Closed
Tracked by #2657
wsxiaoys opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed
Tracked by #2657

[Answer Engine]For code references, when the file content is reasonble(e.g <200 LoC), include whole file content directly, instead of only including the chunk. #3096

wsxiaoys opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
@Sma1lboy
Labels
enhancement New feature or request fixed-in-next-release good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@wsxiaoys
Copy link
Member

wsxiaoys commented Sep 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Code Location: https://demo.tabbyml.com/files/github/TabbyML/tabby/-/blob/abde89bf8178713b8def3db081597ea01c8183b9/ee/tabby-webserver/src/service/answer.rs#L178

Currently, only the chunk being matched (CodeSearchHit.doc.body) is being inserted in LLM context, we might consider insert the whole file if there're multiple file from same file and the whole file is <= K lines.
@wsxiaoys wsxiaoys changed the title For code references, when the file content is reasonble(e.g <200 LoC), include whole file content directly, instead of only including the chunk. [Answer Engine]For code references, when the file content is reasonble(e.g <200 LoC), include whole file content directly, instead of only including the chunk. Sep 6, 2024
@wsxiaoys wsxiaoys added good first issue Good for newcomers enhancement New feature or request labels Sep 6, 2024
@wsxiaoys wsxiaoys mentioned this issue Sep 11, 2024
Open
6 tasks
@Sma1lboy Sma1lboy mentioned this issue Oct 7, 2024
Merged
@wsxiaoys
Copy link
Member Author

fixed in 0.19

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Sma1lboy Sma1lboy

Labels
enhancement New feature or request fixed-in-next-release good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@wsxiaoys @Sma1lboy