You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi!
Thanks for developing Tracer!
I am using it with a dataset of ~4k cells and there is something strange with the output of assemble with one specific cell. The file filtered_TCRs.txt outputs two Beta chains but both have the same ID (see below). When you look closely you can note the following:
Both chains share the CDR3 sequence, the D and the J segment.
The V segment only differs in the allele of the usage (TRBV7-8*01 vs. TRBV7-8*03)
The TPM of the first cell is unusually small (3.29) while the second one has values similar to other detected chains in my dataset (1472)
In both chains the TRBV7-8*01 has 100 % identity, while TRBV7-8*03 has 99.286 and 99.303, respectively. However *03 allele was chosen in the first chain.
I don't know if this is unexpected behaviour. Should I assume both chains are the same? or is there a significant difference between the two sequences?
The output of unfiltered_TCR.txt is exactly the same as filtered_TCR.txt.
#TCR_B#
##TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i2##
V segment: TRBV7-8*03
D segment: TRBD1*01
J segment: TRBJ2-2*01
ID: TRBV7-8_AGACGCTCAGGGGTGGTCACCG_TRBJ2-2
TPM: 3.29375
Productive: True
Stop codon: False
In frame: True
CDR3aa: ASRRSGVVTGELF
CDR3nt: GCCAGCAGACGCTCAGGGGTGGTCACCGGGGAGCTGTTT
Segment query_id subject_id % identity alignment length mismatches gap opens gaps
q start q end s start s end e value bit score
V reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i2 TRBV7-8*03 99.286 140 1 0 0 78 217 148
287 2.40e-58 216
V reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i2 TRBV7-8*01 100.000 137 0 0 0 78 214 148
284 7.08e-58 215
V reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i2 TRBV7-8*02 99.270 137 1 0 0 78 214 148
284 6.14e-57 212
V reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i2 TRBV7-4*01 89.362 141 15 0 0 74 214 144
284 1.11e-45 174
V reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i2 TRBV7-2*01 93.496 123 8 0 0 92 214 162
284 8.34e-44 168
D reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i2 TRBD1*01 100.000 6 0 0 0 220 225 5
10 4.0 12.4
J reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i2 TRBJ2-2*01 100.000 47 0 0 0 230 276 5
51 1.93e-22 93.7
##TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i1##
V segment: TRBV7-8*01
D segment: TRBD1*01
J segment: TRBJ2-2*01
ID: TRBV7-8_AGCAGACGCTCAGGGGTGGTCACCG_TRBJ2-2
TPM: 1472.31
Productive: True
Stop codon: False
In frame: True
CDR3aa: ASRRSGVVTGELF
CDR3nt: GCCAGCAGACGCTCAGGGGTGGTCACCGGGGAGCTGTTT
Segment query_id subject_id % identity alignment length mismatches gap opens gaps
q start q end s start s end e value bit score
V reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i1 TRBV7-8*01 100.000 284 0 0 0 16 299 1
284 8.99e-127 444
V reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i1 TRBV7-8*03 99.303 287 2 0 0 16 302 1
287 2.65e-126 442
V reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i1 TRBV7-8*02 99.648 284 1 0 0 16 299 1
284 7.80e-126 441
V reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i1 TRBV7-6*01 90.845 284 26 0 0 16 299 1
284 2.21e-102 363
V reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i1 TRBV7-4*01 90.493 284 27 0 0 16 299 1
284 1.91e-101 360
D reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i1 TRBD1*01 100.000 6 0 0 0 305 310 5
10 4.5 12.4
J reversed|TRINITY_DN0_c0_g1_i1 TRBJ2-2*01 100.000 47 0 0 0 315 361 5
51 2.17e-22 93.7
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
Thanks for developing Tracer!
I am using it with a dataset of ~4k cells and there is something strange with the output of assemble with one specific cell. The file
filtered_TCRs.txt
outputs two Beta chains but both have the same ID (see below). When you look closely you can note the following:I don't know if this is unexpected behaviour. Should I assume both chains are the same? or is there a significant difference between the two sequences?
The output of
unfiltered_TCR.txt
is exactly the same asfiltered_TCR.txt
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: