Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reverting tox_loop PR changes #538

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 22, 2017

Conversation

nurupo
Copy link
Member

@nurupo nurupo commented Apr 16, 2017

Want to see if reverting the tox loop PR would fix OS X tests, before actually looking into the code to see what could have broken them.


This change is Reviewable

@robinlinden
Copy link
Member

:lgtm_strong:


Reviewed 21 of 21 files at r1.
Review status: all files reviewed at latest revision, all discussions resolved.


Comments from Reviewable

@nurupo
Copy link
Member Author

nurupo commented Apr 16, 2017

Why lgtm? This isn't meant to be merged.

@optimumtact
Copy link

lgtm

@nurupo
Copy link
Member Author

nurupo commented Apr 22, 2017

@robinlinden @iphydf So, do we want to merge this?

@robinlinden
Copy link
Member

I think we should merge this and ask @Ansa89 to open a new PR with the tox_loop code. I don't want to make a release while OS X is broken.

@nurupo nurupo changed the title Just playing with Travis, please ignore Reverting tox_loop PR changes Apr 22, 2017
@nurupo nurupo force-pushed the test-removing-tox-loop branch from 547e22d to c25e3d2 Compare April 22, 2017 19:32
@robinlinden robinlinden merged commit c25e3d2 into TokTok:master Apr 22, 2017
@nurupo
Copy link
Member Author

nurupo commented Apr 26, 2017

@vassad It breaks toxcore tests for OSX.

@vassad
Copy link

vassad commented Apr 27, 2017

@nurupo thx, didn't see this PR ...

@iphydf
Copy link
Member

iphydf commented Dec 29, 2021

I guess this never got its new PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants