Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

documentation is very out of date, especially Trustchain #4656

Closed
qstokkink opened this issue Jul 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

documentation is very out of date, especially Trustchain #4656

qstokkink opened this issue Jul 4, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@qstokkink
Copy link
Contributor

https://github.com/Tribler/tribler/blob/devel/doc/trustchain.rst

We still refer to Dispersy even 😃

@qstokkink qstokkink added this to the Backlog milestone Jul 4, 2019
@synctext synctext changed the title Trustchain documentation is very out of date documentation is very out of date, especially Trustchain Jul 7, 2019
@synctext
Copy link
Member

synctext commented Jul 7, 2019

Got feedback from an excellent technical writer on working for us. Writing down priorities and schedule for a 4 month documentation refactoring.

Duration activity Audience
??? weeks Conduct deep-dive into Tribler as preparation; rewriting the main wiki project overview page plus short readme.md General Public
? weeks 1 web page fluffy promo. Accomplishments of past 17 years, self-replication AI and alternative Big Tech in future General Public
? weeks promo: "tokens for cultural heritage". From Trustchain, credit mining, with artist income of 100% to trust function against spam and evilness General Public
? weeks Trustchain mild overview General Public
? weeks Trustchain IETF technical documentation technical
? weeks IPv8 developers

@drew2a
Copy link
Contributor

drew2a commented Jun 6, 2024

We do not have trustchain.rst anymore.

@drew2a drew2a closed this as completed Jun 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants