Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

False-negative checks on a rare content #6131

Closed
drew2a opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed

False-negative checks on a rare content #6131

drew2a opened this issue May 27, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@drew2a
Copy link
Contributor

drew2a commented May 27, 2021

How to reproduce:

  1. Open Tribler
  2. Check the content of fma_medium_april channel (the content will be mostly "red")
  3. Try to download the red content
  4. The content will be downloaded successfully

image
image

I see the described behavior on my test channel, but at the same time, I see this behavior on the content in other channels.

@drew2a drew2a changed the title [7.9.0] False-negative checks on rare content [7.9.0] False-negative checks on a rare content May 27, 2021
@ichorid
Copy link
Contributor

ichorid commented May 27, 2021

DHT checks are unreliable. Good luck fixing this! 🍀

@drew2a drew2a changed the title [7.9.0] False-negative checks on a rare content False-negative checks on a rare content Jan 23, 2023
@drew2a drew2a added this to the 7.14.0 milestone Jan 23, 2023
@drew2a drew2a self-assigned this Jan 23, 2023
@drew2a
Copy link
Contributor Author

drew2a commented Feb 2, 2023

We added a tooltip (here #7286) that shows the time of the last check and figured out that most of the health is pretty outdated.
Thus, the main cause of this issue may not be unreliable DHT checking, but incorrect health information.

seeder_leechers

@drew2a
Copy link
Contributor Author

drew2a commented Feb 20, 2023

Fixed by @kozlovsky in #7286

@drew2a drew2a closed this as completed Feb 20, 2023
@drew2a drew2a modified the milestones: 7.14.0, 7.13.0 Feb 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants