Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update faq.md #476

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2015
Merged

Update faq.md #476

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 20, 2015

Conversation

johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member

Add clarity to the docs around version and not generating JS. Raised to handle #469

Add clarity to the docs around version and not generating JS.  Raised to handle #469
@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member Author

@basarat - are you happy for me to merge this docs change?

## Which version of TypeScript does atom-typescript use?
It uses [ntypescript](https://github.com/TypeStrong/ntypescript) which is just a build of Microsoft/Master. This means it's the latest and greatest of the TypeScript goodness. There is a possibility that in the future it will move to TypeScript nightlies which is something that the TypeScript team is planning.

## So can I specify which version of TypeScript I'd like to use in atom-typescript?
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually you can use a custom build : https://github.com/TypeStrong/atom-typescript/blob/master/docs/faq.md#can-i-use-a-custom-typescript-compiler and effectively a different TypeScript compiler version ... as long as it is compatible with the latest version. Please not that newer compiler version are rarely 100% API compatible (something that is internal to the compiler ... doesn't impact TS source code but does impact TS dev tools) with previous compiler versions so your mileage may vary.

Brought in line with @basarat's comments.
@johnnyreilly
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the clarification @basarat. I've amended the docs in line with what you've said and moved the compiler option a little further up so things on a similar topic are grouped.

Does this work for you?

basarat added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 20, 2015
@basarat basarat merged commit b04304e into master Jul 20, 2015
@basarat basarat deleted the johnnyreilly-patch-1 branch July 20, 2015 12:20
@basarat
Copy link
Member

basarat commented Jul 20, 2015

Awesome 🌹

@TypeStrong TypeStrong locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 20, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants