You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Re-opening #1948, as our empty module is still not documented after 7918fba.
After examining the proposed fix in v0.23 and our module, it looks like the difference is that your test case has an export, while our module has no exports. So this block does an early out:
if (allExports.every((exp) => this.shouldIgnore(exp))) {
this.owner.logger.verbose(`All members of ${entryName} are excluded, ignoring entry point.`);
return;
}
And sure enough we see that with verbose logging:
All members of polyfill are excluded, ignoring entry point.
An empty module with no exports, but a @module docstring, should be included, as it was before #1607.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmmm.... this if was apparently added to fix the original bug with empty modules due to excludeNotDocumented. I guess it's probably okay to remove it...
Re-opening #1948, as our empty module is still not documented after 7918fba.
After examining the proposed fix in v0.23 and our module, it looks like the difference is that your test case has an export, while our module has no exports. So this block does an early out:
And sure enough we see that with verbose logging:
An empty module with no exports, but a
@module
docstring, should be included, as it was before #1607.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: