We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
missing, omitted, comment, property, method, interface, signature
I'm working on upgrading a library from typedoc 0.19 -> 0.25 and I'm noticing that comments on index signatures are being dropped:
export interface ObjectWithIndexSignature { /** Looking for this JSDoc comment in the output JSON. */ [x: string]: any; }
The reflection for the index signature both return ref.hasComment() == false and I no longer get the comment contents.
ref.hasComment() == false
You can see my Jest snapshots which changed to flag this regression in my upgrade PR here: palantir/documentalist#156 (comment)
I should get comments on index signatures like I previously did with typedoc v0.19
See repro on my fork here: adidahiya/typedoc-repros#1
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good find!
Sorry, something went wrong.
9fbeeab
nice, thanks for the quick fix @Gerrit0!
No branches or pull requests
Search terms
missing, omitted, comment, property, method, interface, signature
Actual Behavior
I'm working on upgrading a library from typedoc 0.19 -> 0.25 and I'm noticing that comments on index signatures are being dropped:
The reflection for the index signature both return
ref.hasComment() == false
and I no longer get the comment contents.You can see my Jest snapshots which changed to flag this regression in my upgrade PR here: palantir/documentalist#156 (comment)
Expected Behavior
I should get comments on index signatures like I previously did with typedoc v0.19
Steps to reproduce the bug
See repro on my fork here: adidahiya/typedoc-repros#1
Environment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: