You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was at an OGC meeting where @ethanrd was describing some work on the NUG
I would like to highlight and discuss with the community one facet that would be massively useful for our group, working on https://github.com/opengeospatial/netcdf-ld and a valuable way to establish good practice for publishing controlled terms
it appears that there are 11 controlled attribute names within the NUG
We extracted these and presented them in a linked data registry which we own, but which has no links to Unidata nor netCDF http://def.scitools.org.uk/NetCDF
this is illustrative, but absolutely not definitive nor endorsed by netCDF / Unidata
The crucial facets of this approach are:
each individual attribute term is defined by a fully qualified unique URI
for any attribute where the value is not from a controlled vocabulary (all of NUG terms, I think)
we would like to investigate with Unidata how to go about establishing that this list is valid, and how to publish the list as a linked data resource set using a controlled and authoritative namespace that demonstrates that a new published list is an authoritative
many thanks
marqh
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello netCDF folks
I was at an OGC meeting where @ethanrd was describing some work on the NUG
I would like to highlight and discuss with the community one facet that would be massively useful for our group, working on https://github.com/opengeospatial/netcdf-ld and a valuable way to establish good practice for publishing controlled terms
we looked a while ago at the now defunct (404ing) resource https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/attribute_conventions.html
it appears that there are 11 controlled attribute names within the NUG
We extracted these and presented them in a linked data registry which we own, but which has no links to Unidata nor netCDF
http://def.scitools.org.uk/NetCDF
this is illustrative, but absolutely not definitive nor endorsed by netCDF / Unidata
The crucial facets of this approach are:
we would like to investigate with Unidata how to go about establishing that this list is valid, and how to publish the list as a linked data resource set using a controlled and authoritative namespace that demonstrates that a new published list is an authoritative
many thanks
marqh
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: