Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Publish NUG attribute names as Linked resources #48

Open
marqh opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Publish NUG attribute names as Linked resources #48

marqh opened this issue Dec 2, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@marqh
Copy link

marqh commented Dec 2, 2021

Hello netCDF folks

I was at an OGC meeting where @ethanrd was describing some work on the NUG

I would like to highlight and discuss with the community one facet that would be massively useful for our group, working on https://github.com/opengeospatial/netcdf-ld and a valuable way to establish good practice for publishing controlled terms

we looked a while ago at the now defunct (404ing) resource https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/docs/attribute_conventions.html

it appears that there are 11 controlled attribute names within the NUG

We extracted these and presented them in a linked data registry which we own, but which has no links to Unidata nor netCDF
http://def.scitools.org.uk/NetCDF

this is illustrative, but absolutely not definitive nor endorsed by netCDF / Unidata

The crucial facets of this approach are:

  1. each individual attribute term is defined by a fully qualified unique URI
  2. rdf:type is defined as rdfs:Property
  3. rdfs:domain is defined as https://www.opengis.net/def/binary-array-ld/Resource
  4. rdfs:range is defined as rdf:Literal
    • for any attribute where the value is not from a controlled vocabulary (all of NUG terms, I think)

we would like to investigate with Unidata how to go about establishing that this list is valid, and how to publish the list as a linked data resource set using a controlled and authoritative namespace that demonstrates that a new published list is an authoritative

many thanks
marqh

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant