Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

improve reputation calculations #37

Open
stojanov-igor opened this issue Apr 25, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #116
Open

improve reputation calculations #37

stojanov-igor opened this issue Apr 25, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #116
Assignees
@stojanov-igor
Labels
current sprint Issue that is planned for the current sprint enhancement New feature or request feature Develop new feature on the application
Milestone
Release 1.0

Comments

@stojanov-igor
Copy link
Member

stojanov-igor commented Apr 25, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Improve the current calculations based on the research and design.

The calculations should be implemented based on design document that is provided here: #36
@stojanov-igor stojanov-igor self-assigned this Apr 25, 2022
@stojanov-igor stojanov-igor added enhancement New feature or request feature Develop new feature on the application on hold Issue is currently on hold. labels Apr 25, 2022
@stojanov-igor stojanov-igor added this to the Release 0.7 milestone Apr 25, 2022
@stojanov-igor stojanov-igor added the current sprint Issue that is planned for the current sprint label Sep 19, 2022
@stojanov-igor
Copy link
Member Author

Intermediate Reputation calculation

After each task, the user can provide a rating on a scale of 1 to 5. For each rating, we increase the reputation of the profile as shown below.

New Reputation = Old Reputation + Weight of current evaluation

Rating = Reputation weight
1 = -2
2 = -1
3 = 0
4 = +1
5 = +2

@stojanov-igor stojanov-igor removed the on hold Issue is currently on hold. label Sep 26, 2022
@stojanov-igor
Copy link
Member Author

Found another paper that we can use for later implementation: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-642-10383-4_42.pdf .

For now the solution above should suffice.

@f-gate f-gate linked a pull request Sep 28, 2022 that will close this issue
37 improve reputation #116
Open
@stojanov-igor stojanov-igor moved this to Review in progress in node-development Feb 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@stojanov-igor stojanov-igor

Labels
current sprint Issue that is planned for the current sprint enhancement New feature or request feature Develop new feature on the application
Projects
node-development
Status: Review in progress
Milestone
Release 1.0
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

37 improve reputation UniversalDot/universal-dot-node
1 participant
@stojanov-igor