You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looks like this is really worth implementing, especially in the Tobler or Marquez-Perez versions, which appropriately penalise even flat walking compared with slightly downhill. The formulas all come directly from ?movecost::movecost.
That commit dropped Naismith in favour of Tobler. Exposing choices between the variants shown above would be highly unlikely to ever make a discernible difference, particularly as errors in interpolating elevation differences from a raster will always far outweight the kinds of minor differences between the functions shown above. This single improvement should be plenty sufficient to make walking times far more realistic.
Currently uses Naismith's Rule, but i found out from this tweet by @michaeldorman about the
movecost
package which implements several alternative cost functions. Some of these could also be implemented.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: