Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should replaceState() be included? #36

Open
tunetheweb opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Should replaceState() be included? #36

tunetheweb opened this issue Dec 4, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@tunetheweb
Copy link
Contributor

Currently we include replaceState navigations (and the equivalent replace navigations from the Navigation API).

Should we?

To me a "navigation" suggests a new history entry, rather than an update of an existing entry.

Chatting with @yoavweiss I don't think we have good examples of site that do use this for soft navs (maybe because none exist?) so unless we get those and verify them I think it's questionable as to whether these should be included.

@tunetheweb tunetheweb changed the title Should replaceState() be included Should replaceState() be included? Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant