Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Considered using kubernetes_manifest resource? #3

Open
sepulworld opened this issue Aug 15, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Considered using kubernetes_manifest resource? #3

sepulworld opened this issue Aug 15, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@sepulworld
Copy link

Hi! 👋 Great project and thank you for sharing.

Quick question - have you all considered moving away from kubectl_manifest provider to instead use the Kubernetes provider kubernetes_manifest resource? It will probably have better long term support and might handle resource dependencies better. Thoughts?

@sepulworld sepulworld changed the title Considered using k8s_manifest resource Considered using kubernetes_manifest resource Aug 15, 2022
@sepulworld sepulworld changed the title Considered using kubernetes_manifest resource Considered using kubernetes_manifest resource? Aug 15, 2022
@pd-t
Copy link
Member

pd-t commented Aug 16, 2022

Yes, you are completely right and we already realized it. We just had not time to refactor the provider. At the moment, we also give Argo-cd a try and I have to admit that it feels quite good. So, perhaps we end up providing files for argocd support and setup everything with terraform. The point is, that this mixed setting is faster and is much more stable to changes.

@pd-t
Copy link
Member

pd-t commented Sep 1, 2022

@sepulworld One more question to you. From a user perspective, would you like to have a terraform kustomization native module or would you accept an argocd mixing?

@tom333
Copy link

tom333 commented Sep 1, 2022

If it can help, I've made an exemple of app of apps argocd's pattern
it's available here if you want : https://github.com/tom333/argocd-kubeflow

@pd-t
Copy link
Member

pd-t commented Sep 5, 2022

Thanks a lot! We are currently refactoring the deployment of our main project os4ml. So, I hope that we can give an update to the end of september on this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants