Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
1740 lines (1572 loc) · 114 KB

README.md

File metadata and controls

1740 lines (1572 loc) · 114 KB
Raw

Hate Speech Dataset Catalogue

This page catalogues datasets annotated for hate speech, online abuse, and offensive language. They may be useful for e.g. training a natural language processing system to detect this language.

The list is maintained by Leon Derczynski, Bertie Vidgen, Hannah Rose Kirk, Pica Johansson, Yi-Ling Chung, Mads Guldborg Kjeldgaard Kongsbak, Laila Sprejer, and Philine Zeinert.

We provide a list of datasets and keywords. If you would like to contribute to our catalogue or add your dataset, please see the instructions for contributing.

If you use these resources, please cite (and read!) our paper: Directions in Abusive Language Training Data: Garbage In, Garbage Out. And if you would like to find other resources for researching online hate, visit The Alan Turing Institute's Online Hate Research Hub or read The Alan Turing Institute's Reading List on Online Hate and Abuse Research.

If you're looking for a good paper on online hate training datasets (beyond our paper, of course!) then have a look at 'Resources and benchmark corpora for hate speech detection: a systematic review' by Poletto et al. in Language Resources and Evaluation.

Please send contributions via github pull request. You can do this by visiting the source code on github and clicking the edit icon (a pencil, above the text, on the right) - more details below. There's a commented-out markdown template at the top of this file. Accompanying data statements preferred for all corpora.

Datasets Table of Contents

List of datasets

Albanian

Detecting Abusive Albanian

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.13592
  • Link to data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19333298.v1
  • Task description: Hierarchical (offensive/not; untargeted/targeted; person/group/other)
  • Details of task: Detect and categorise abusive language in social media data
  • Size of dataset: 11 874
  • Percentage abusive: 13.2%
  • Language: Albanian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Instagram, Youtube
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Nurce, E., Keci, J., Derczynski, L., 2021. Detecting Abusive Albanian. arXiv:2107.13592
  • Dataset reader: 🤗 strombergnlp/shaj

Arabic

Let-Mi: An Arabic Levantine Twitter Dataset for Misogynistic Language

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.10195
  • Link to data: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mM2vnjsy7QfUmdVUpKqHRJjZyQobhTrW/view
  • Task description: Binary (misogyny/none) and Multi-class (none, discredit, derailing, dominance, stereotyping & objectification, threat of violence, sexual harassment, damning)
  • Details of task: Introducing an Arabic Levantine Twitter dataset for Misogynistic language
  • Size of dataset: 6,603 direct tweet replies
  • Percentage abusive: 48.76%
  • Language: Arabic
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Hala Mulki and Bilal Ghanem. 2021. Let-Mi: An Arabic Levantine Twitter Dataset for Misogynistic Language. In Proceedings of the Sixth Arabic Natural Language Processing Workshop, pages 154–163, Kyiv, Ukraine (Virtual). Association for Computational Linguistics

Are They our Brothers? Analysis and Detection of Religious Hate Speech in the Arabic Twittersphere

  • Link to publication: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8508247
  • Link to data: https://github.com/nuhaalbadi/Arabic_hatespeech
  • Task description: Binary (Hate, Not)
  • Details of task: Religious subcategories
  • Size of dataset: 6,136
  • Percentage abusive: 0.45
  • Language: Arabic
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Albadi, N., Kurdi, M. and Mishra, S., 2018. Are they Our Brothers? Analysis and Detection of Religious Hate Speech in the Arabic Twittersphere. In: International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE, pp.69-76.

Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysis (Arabic)

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.11049
  • Link to data: https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/MLMA_hate_speech
  • Task description: Detailed taxonomy with cross-cutting attributes: Hostility, Directness, Target Attribute, Target Group, How annotators felt on seeing the tweet.
  • Details of task: Gender, Sexual orientation, Religion, Disability
  • Size of dataset: 3,353
  • Percentage abusive: 0.64
  • Language: Arabic
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Ousidhoum, N., Lin, Z., Zhang, H., Song, Y. and Yeung, D., 2019. Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysis. ArXiv,.

L-HSAB: A Levantine Twitter Dataset for Hate Speech and Abusive Language

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-3512
  • Link to data: https://github.com/Hala-Mulki/L-HSAB-First-Arabic-Levantine-HateSpeech-Dataset
  • Task description: Ternary (Hate, Abusive, Normal)
  • Details of task: Group-directed + Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 5,846
  • Percentage abusive: 0.38
  • Language: Arabic
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Mulki, H., Haddad, H., Bechikh, C. and Alshabani, H., 2019. L-HSAB: A Levantine Twitter Dataset for Hate Speech and Abusive Language. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online. Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.111-118.

Abusive Language Detection on Arabic Social Media (Twitter)

Abusive Language Detection on Arabic Social Media (Al Jazeera)

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W17-3008
  • Link to data: http://alt.qcri.org/~hmubarak/offensive/AJCommentsClassification-CF.xlsx
  • Task description: Ternary (Obscene, Offensive but not obscene, Clean)
  • Details of task: Incivility
  • Size of dataset: 32,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.81
  • Language: Arabic
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: AlJazeera
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Mubarak, H., Darwish, K. and Magdy, W., 2017. Abusive Language Detection on Arabic Social Media. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online. Vancouver, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.52-56.

Dataset Construction for the Detection of Anti-Social Behaviour in Online Communication in Arabic

Bengali

Hate Speech Detection in the Bengali language: A Dataset and its Baseline Evaluation

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.09686.pdf
  • Link to data: https://www.kaggle.com/naurosromim/bengali-hate-speech-dataset
  • Task description: Binary (hateful, not)
  • Details of task: Several categories: sports, entertainment, crime, religion, politics, celebrity and meme
  • Size of dataset: 30,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.33
  • Language: Bengali
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Youtube and Facebook
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Romim, N., Ahmed, M., Talukder, H., & Islam, M. S. (2021). Hate speech detection in the bengali language: A dataset and its baseline evaluation. In Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Advances in Computational Intelligence (pp. 457-468). Springer, Singapore.

Chinese

SWSR: A Chinese Dataset and Lexicon for Online Sexism Detection

  • Link to publication: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2468696421000604#fn1
  • Link to data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4773875
  • Task description: Binary (Sexist, Non-sexist), Categories of sexism (Stereotype based on Appearance, Stereotype based on Cultural Background, MicroAggression, and Sexual Offense), Target of sexism (Individual or Generic)
  • Details of task: Sexism detection on social media in Chinese
  • Size of dataset: 8,969 comments from 1,527 weibos
  • Percentage abusive: 34.5%
  • Language: Chinese
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Sina Weibo
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Aiqi Jiang, Xiaohan Yang, Yang Liu, Arkaitz Zubiaga, SWSR: A Chinese dataset and lexicon for online sexism detection, Online Social Networks and Media, Volume 27, 2022, 100182, ISSN 2468-6964.

Croatian

CoRAL: a Context-aware Croatian Abusive Language Dataset

Datasets of Slovene and Croatian Moderated News Comments

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W18-5116
  • Link to data: http://hdl.handle.net/11356/1202
  • Task description: Binary (Deleted, Not)
  • Details of task: Flagged content
  • Size of dataset: 17,000,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.02
  • Language: Croatian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: 24sata website
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Ljubešić, N., Erjavec, T. and Fišer, D., 2018. Datasets of Slovene and Croatian Moderated News Comments. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2). Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.124-131.

Automating News Comment Moderation with Limited Resources: Benchmarking in Croatian and Estonian

  • Link to publication: https://jlcl.org/content/2-allissues/1-heft1-2020/jlcl_2020-1_3.pdf
  • Link to data: https://www.clarin.si/repository/xmlui/handle/11356/1399
  • Task description: Multi-class based on Different rules
  • Details of task: Flagged content performmed by the real newspaper moderators
  • Size of dataset: 21M
  • Percentage abusive: 7.8%
  • Language: Croatian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Newspaper comments
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Ravi Shekhar, Marko Pranjić, Senja Pollak, Andraž Pelicon, Matthew Purver (2020). Automating News Comment Moderation with Limited Resources: Benchmarking in Croatian and Estonian. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics (JLCL).

Danish

Offensive Language and Hate Speech Detection for Danish

BAJER: Misogyny in Danish

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.247/
  • Link to data: request here
  • Task description: Hierarchy of abusive content labels including subcategories of misogyny
  • Details of task: "Misogyny detection on social media in Danish"
  • Size of dataset: 27.9K comments
  • Percentage abusive: 7% misogynistic, 27% abusive (i.e. 20% abusive but not misogyny)
  • Language: Danish
  • Level of annotation: Social media post / comment
  • Platform: Twitter, Facebook, Reddit
  • Medium: text
  • Reference: Zeinert, Inie, & Derczynski, 2021. "Annotating Online Misogyny". Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, ACL
  • Dataset reader: 🤗 strombergnlp/bajer_danish_misogyny

Dutch

The Dutch Abusive Language Corpus v1.0 (DALC v1.0)

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2021.woah-1.6.pdf - link to the documentation and/or a data statement about the data
  • Link to data: https://github.com/tommasoc80/DALC
  • Task description: Multilayered (explicitness and target) for abusive language
  • Details of task: Abusive language detection in social media in Dutch
  • Size of dataset: 8,156 tweets
  • Percentage abusive: 15.06% explicitly abusive; 8.09% implicitly abusive
  • Language: Dutch
  • Level of annotation: tweets
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: text
  • Reference: Caselli, T., Schelhaas, A., Weultjes, M., Leistra, F., van der Veen, H., Timmerman, G., and Nissim, M. 2021. "DALC: the Dutch Abusive Language Corpus". Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH 2021), ACL.

English

Large-Scale Hate Speech Detection with Cross-Domain Transfer

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.238/
  • Link to data: https://github.com/avaapm/hatespeech
  • Task description: Three-class (Hate speech, Offensive language, None)
  • Details of task: Hate speech detection on social media (Twitter) including 5 target groups (gender, race, religion, politics, sports)
  • Size of dataset: 100k English (27593 hate, 30747 offensive, 41660 none)
  • Percentage abusive: 58.3%
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text and image
  • Reference: Cagri Toraman, Furkan Şahinuç, Eyup Yilmaz. 2022. Large-Scale Hate Speech Detection with Cross-Domain Transfer. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 2215–2225, Marseille, France. European Language Resources Association.

ConvAbuse

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.587/
  • Link to data: https://github.com/amandacurry/convabuse
  • Task description: Hierarchical: 1. Abuse binary, Abuse severity 1,0,-1,-2,-3; 2. Directedness explicit, implicit Target group, individual–system, individual–3rd party, Type general, sexist, sexual harassment, homophobic, racist, transphobic, ableist, intellectual
  • Details of task: Abuse detection in conversational AI
  • Size of dataset: 4,185
  • Percentage abusive: c. 20%
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: utterance (with conversational context)
  • Platform: Carbonbot on Facebook Messenger and E.L.I.Z.A. chatbots
  • Medium: text
  • Reference: Curry, A. C., Abercrombie, G., & Rieser, V. 2021. ConvAbuse: Data, Analysis, and Benchmarks for Nuanced Detection in Conversational AI. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (pp. 7388-7403).

Measuring Hate Speech

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.10277
  • Link to data: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ucberkeley-dlab/measuring-hate-speech
  • Task description: 10 ordinal labels (sentiment, (dis)respect, insult, humiliation, inferior status, violence, dehumanization, genocide, attack/defense, hate speech), which are debiased and aggregated into a continuous hate speech severity score (hate_speech_score) that includes a region for counterspeech & supportive speeech. Includes 8 target identity groups (race/ethnicity, religion, national origin/citizenship, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, political ideology) and 42 identity subgroups.
  • Details of task: Hate speech measurement on social media in English
  • Size of dataset: 39,565 comments annotated by 7,912 annotators on 10 ordinal labels, for 1,355,560 total labels.
  • Percentage abusive: 25% - however this dichotomization is not in the spirit of the paper/dataset
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Social media comment
  • Platform: Twitter, Reddit, YouTube
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Kennedy, C. J., Bacon, G., Sahn, A., & von Vacano, C. (2020). Constructing interval variables via faceted Rasch measurement and multitask deep learning: a hate speech application. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.10277.

Learning From the Worst (Dynamically generated hate speech dataset)

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.132/
  • Link to data: https://github.com/bvidgen/Dynamically-Generated-Hate-Speech-Dataset
  • Task description: Multi-category hate speech detection
  • Details of task: Hate detection with fine-grained labels for the type and target of hate. Generated over 4 rounds of human-and-model-in-the-loop adversarial data generation. Collected through Dynabench.
  • Size of dataset: 41,255
  • Percentage abusive: 54%
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: posts
  • Platform: Synthetically generated by humans to mimic real-world social media posts
  • Medium: text
  • Reference: Vidgen, B., Thurush, T., Waseem, Z., Kiela, D., 2021. Learning from the worst: dynamically generated datasets to improve online hate detection. In Proceedings of the 59th Meeting of the Association for Computational Lingusitics (pp. 1667-1682).

The 'Call me sexist, but' sexism dataset

  • Link to publication: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/18085/17888
  • Link to data: https://doi.org/10.7802/2251
  • Task description: Sexism detection based on content and phrasing
  • Details of task: Sexism detection on English social media data informed by survey items measuring sexist attitudes and adversarial examples
  • Size of dataset: 6325
  • Percentage abusive: 28%
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: tweets and survey items
  • Platform: Twitter, Social Psychology scales
  • Medium: text
  • Reference: Samory, M., Sen, I., Kohne, J., Flöck, F. and Wagner, C., 2021, May. Call me sexist, but…: Revisiting sexism detection using psychological scales and adversarial samples. In Intl AAAI Conf. Web and Social Media (pp. 573-584).

Hate Towards the Political Opponent: A Twitter Corpus Study of the 2020 US Elections on the Basis of Offensive Speech and Stance Detection__

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2021.wassa-1.18/
  • Link to data: https://www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/data/stance_hof_us2020
  • Task description: Hate / Offensive or neither
  • Details of task: Data collected to be Twitter by supporters of Trump or Biden
  • Size of dataset: 3,000
  • Percentage abusive: 12%
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Lara Grimminger and Roman Klinger (2020): Hate Towards the Political Opponent: A Twitter Corpus Study of the 2020 US Elections on the Basis of Offensive Speech and Stance Detection. 11th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment & Social Media Analysis (collocated with EACL 2021).

AbuseEval v1.0

  • Link to publication: http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2020/pdf/2020.lrec-1.760.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/tommasoc80/AbuseEval
  • Task description: Explicitness annotation of offensive and abusive content
  • Details of task: Enriched versions of the OffensEval/OLID dataset with the distinction of explicit/implicit offensive messages and the new dimension for abusive messages. Labels for offensive language: EXPLICIT, IMPLICT, NOT; Labels for abusive language: EXPLICIT, IMPLICT, NOTABU
  • Size of dataset: 14,100
  • Percentage abusive: 20.75%
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: tweets
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: text
  • Reference: Caselli, T., Basile, V., Jelena, M., Inga, K., and Michael, G. 2020. "I feel offended, don’t be abusive! implicit/explicit messages in offensive and abusive language". The 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 6193-6202). European Language Resources Association.

Do You Really Want to Hurt Me? Predicting Abusive Swearing in Social Media

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.lrec-1.765.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/dadangewp/SWAD-Repository
  • Task description: Binary (abusive swear word, non-abusive swear word)
  • Details of task: Abusive swearing
  • Size of dataset: 1,511 swear words (1675 tweets)
  • Percentage abusive: 0.41% (word level), 0.51% (post level)
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Words
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Pamungkas, E. W., Basile, V., & Patti, V. (2020). Do you really want to hurt me? predicting abusive swearing in social media. In The 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (pp. 6237-6246). European Language Resources Association.

Multimodal Meme Dataset (MultiOFF) for Identifying Offensive Content in Image and Text

Hatemoji: A Test Suite and Adversarially-Generated Dataset for Benchmarking and Detecting Emoji-based Hate

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/abs/2108.05921
  • Link to data: https://github.com/HannahKirk/Hatemoji
  • Task description: Branching structure of tasks: Binary (Hate, Not Hate), Within Hate (Type, Target)
  • Details of task: Hate speech detection for text statements including emoji, consisting of a checklist-based test suite (HatemojiCheck) and an adversarially-generated dataset (HatemojiBuild)
  • Size of dataset: HatemojiCheck = 3,930; HatemojiBuild = 5,912.
  • Percentage abusive: HatemojiCheck = 69%, HatemojiBuild = 50%
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Post
  • Platform: Synthetically-Generated
  • Medium: Text with emoji
  • Reference: Kirk, H. R., Vidgen, B., Röttger, P., Thrush, T., & Hale, S. A. 2021. Hatemoji: A test suite and adversarially-generated dataset for benchmarking and detecting emoji-based hate. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.05921.

HateCheck: Functional Tests for Hate Speech Detection Models

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.15606.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/paul-rottger/hatecheck-data
  • Task description: Binary (Hate, Not Hate), 7 Targets Within Hate (Women, Trans people, Black people, Gay people, Disabled people, Muslims, Immigrants)
  • Details of task: A checklist of functional tests to evaluate hate speech detection models.
  • Size of dataset: 3,728
  • Percentage abusive: 68%
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Post
  • Platform: Synthetically-Generated
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Röttger, P., Vidgen, B., Nguyen, D., Waseem, Z., Margetts, H. and Pierrehumbert, J., 2020. Hatecheck: Functional tests for hate speech detection models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.15606.

Semeval-2021 Task 5: Toxic Spans Detection

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2021.semeval-1.6.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/ipavlopoulos/toxic_spans
  • Task description: Binary toxic spans (toxic, non-toxic) & reading comprehension
  • Details of task: Predict the spans of toxic posts that were responsible for the toxic label of the posts.
  • Size of dataset: 10,629
  • Percentage abusive: 0.56
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Civil Comments
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Pavlopoulos, J., Sorensen, J., Laugier, L., & Androutsopoulos, I. (2021, August). Semeval-2021 task 5: Toxic spans detection. In Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2021) (pp. 59-69).

Human-in-the-Loop for Data Collection: a Multi-Target Counter Narrative Dataset to Fight Online Hate Speech

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2021.acl-long.250.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/marcoguerini/CONAN
  • Task description: Binary (hateful, not)
  • Details of task: race, religion, country of origin, sexual orientation, disability, gender
  • Size of dataset: 5,003
  • Percentage abusive: 1
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Semi-synthetic text
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Margherita Fanton, Helena Bonaldi, Serra Sinem Tekiroğlu, Marco Guerini Human-in-the-Loop for Data Collection: a Multi-Target Counter Narrative Dataset to Fight Online Hate Speech In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers.

HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detection

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.10289
  • Link to data: https://github.com/punyajoy/HateXplain
  • Task description: Level of hate (hate, offensive or normal), on target groups (race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, miscellaneous), and rationales
  • Details of task: Hate per se
  • Size of dataset: 20,148
  • Percentage abusive: 0.57
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Words, phrases, posts
  • Platform: Twitter and Gab
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Mathew, B., Saha, P., Yimam, S. M., Biemann, C., Goyal, P., & Mukherjee, A. (2021, May). HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detection. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 35, No. 17, pp. 14867-14875).

ALONE: A Dataset for Toxic Behavior among Adolescents on Twitter

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.06465.pdf
  • Link to data: Data made available upon request, please email Ugur Kursuncu ugur@gsu.edu and thilini@sc.edu thilini@sc.edu.
  • Task description: Binary (Toxic, Non-Toxic)
  • Details of task: Annotates interactions (Tweets and their replies), and assigns keywords describing use of emojis, URL content and images.
  • Size of dataset: 688
  • Percentage abusive: 0.17
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Post
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Multimodal (text, images, emojis, metadata)
  • Reference: Wijesiriwardene, T., Inan, H., Kursuncu, U., Gaur, M., Shalin, V., Thirunarayan, K., Sheth, A. and Arpinar, I., 2020, Arxiv.

Towards a Comprehensive Taxonomy and Large-Scale Annotated Corpus for Online Slur Usage

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.alw-1.17.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/networkdynamics/slur-corpus
  • Task description: 4 primary categories (derogatory, appropriate, non-derogatory/non-appropriate, homonyms, noise)
  • Details of task: Hate per se
  • Size of dataset: 39,811
  • Percentage abusive: 0.52
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Reddit
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Kurrek, J., Saleem, H. M., & Ruths, D. (2020, November). Towards a comprehensive taxonomy and large-scale annotated corpus for online slur usage. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (pp. 138-149).

Multimodal Meme Dataset (MultiOFF) for Identifying Offensive Content in Image and Text

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.trac-1.6.pdf
  • Link to data: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.trac-1.6.pdf
  • Task description: Binary (offensive, non-offensive)
  • Details of task: Hate per se (related to 2016 U.S. presidential election)
  • Size of dataset: 743
  • Percentage abusive: 0.41
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Kaggle, Reddit, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram
  • Medium: Text and Images/memes
  • Reference: Suryawanshi, S., Chakravarthi, B. R., Arcan, M., & Buitelaar, P. (2020, May). Multimodal meme dataset (MultiOFF) for identifying offensive content in image and text. In Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Trolling, Aggression and Cyberbullying (pp. 32-41).

Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Media

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/N19-1144.pdf
  • Link to data: https://scholar.harvard.edu/malmasi/olid
  • Task description: Branching structure of tasks. A: offensive / not, B: targeted insult / untargeted, C: individual, group, other.
  • Details of task: Hate per se
  • Size of dataset: 14,100
  • Percentage abusive: 0.33
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Zampieri, M., Malmasi, S., Nakov, P., Rosenthal, S., Farra, N., & Kumar, R. (2019, June). Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) (pp. 1415-1420).

Nuanced metrics for measuring unintended bias with real data for text classification

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1903.04561.pdf
  • Link to data: https://www.tensorflow.org/datasets/catalog/civil_comments
  • Task description: Toxicity (severe, obscene, threat, insult, identity attack, sexual explicit), and several identity attributes (e.g., gender, religion and race)
  • Details of task: Hate per se
  • Size of dataset: 1,804,875
  • Percentage abusive: 0.8
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Comments/posts
  • Platform: Civil Comments
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Borkan, D., Dixon, L., Sorensen, J., Thain, N., & Vasserman, L. (2019, May). Nuanced metrics for measuring unintended bias with real data for text classification. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference (pp. 491-500).

Introducing CAD: the Contextual Abuse Dataset

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2021.naacl-main.182.pdf
  • Link to data: https://zenodo.org/record/4881008#.Ye6OwhP7R6o
  • Task description: Contextually abusive language, person-directed + group-directed
  • Details of task: Primary categories (secondary categories): Abusive + Identity-directed (derogation/animosity/threatening/glorification/dehumanization), Abusive + Person-directed (derogation/animosity/threatening/glorification/dehumanization), Abusive + Affiliation directed (abuse to them/abuse about them), Counter Speech (against identity-directed abuse/against affiliation-directed abuse/against person-directed abuse), Non-hateful Slurs and Neutral.
  • Size of dataset: 25,000
  • Percentage abusive: Affiliation-directed, 6%; Identity-directed, 13%; Person-directed, 5%
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Conversation thread
  • Platform: Reddit
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Vidgen, B., Nguyen, D., Margetts, H., Rossini, P., and Troble, R., Introducing CAD: the Contextual Abuse Dataset, 2021, In: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp.2289–2303

Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language

Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forum

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W18-5102.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/Vicomtech/hate-speech-dataset
  • Task description: Ternary (Hate, Relation, Not)
  • Details of task: Hate per se
  • Size of dataset: 9,916
  • Percentage abusive: 0.11
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Sentence - with context of the converstaional thread taken into account
  • Platform: Stormfront
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: de Gibert, O., Perez, N., García-Pablos, A., and Cuadros, M., 2018. Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forum. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2). Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.11-20.

Hateful Symbols or Hateful People? Predictive Features for Hate Speech Detection on Twitter

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N16-2013
  • Link to data: https://github.com/ZeerakW/hatespeech
  • Task description: 3-topic (Sexist, Racist, Not)
  • Details of task: Racism, Sexism
  • Size of dataset: 16,914
  • Percentage abusive: 0.32
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Waseem, Z. and Horvy, D., 2016. Hateful Symbols or Hateful People? Predictive Features for Hate Speech Detection on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the NAACL Student Research Workshop. San Diego, California: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.88-93.

Detecting Online Hate Speech Using Context Aware Models

The Gab Hate Corpus: A collection of 27k posts annotated for hate speech

  • Link to publication: https://psyarxiv.com/hqjxn/
  • Link to data: https://osf.io/edua3/
  • Task description: Binary (Hate vs. Offensive/Vulgarity), Binary (Assault on human Dignity/Call for Violence – sub task on message delivery, binary: explicit/implicit), Multinomial classification: Identity based hate (race/ethnicity, nationality/regionalism/xenophobia, gender, religion/belief system, sexual orientation, ideology, political identification/party, mental/physical health)
  • Details of task: Group-directed + Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 27,665
  • Percentage abusive: 0.09 Hate, 0.06 Offensive/Vulgar
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Post
  • Platform: Gab
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Kennedy, B., Araria, M., Mostafazadeh Davani, A., Yeh, L., Omrani, A., Kim, Y., Koombs, K., Havaldar, S., Portillo-Wightman, G., Gonzalez, E., Hoover, J., Azatain, A., Hussain, A., Lara, A., Olmos, G., Omary, A., Park, C., Wang, C., Wang, X., Zhang, Y. and Dehghani, M., 2018, The Gab Hate Corpus: A collection of 27k posts annotated for hate speech. PsyArXiv.

Are You a Racist or Am I Seeing Things? Annotator Influence on Hate Speech Detection on Twitter

  • Link to publication: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3eeb/b7907a9b94f8d65f969f63b76ff5f643f6d3.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/ZeerakW/hatespeech
  • Task description: Multi-topic (Sexist, Racist, Neither, Both)
  • Details of task: Racism, Sexism
  • Size of dataset: 4,033
  • Percentage abusive: 0.16
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Waseem, Z., 2016. Are You a Racist or Am I Seeing Things? Annotator Influence on Hate Speech Detection on Twitter. In: Proceedings of 2016 EMNLP Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science. Copenhagen, Denmark: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.138-142.

When Does a Compliment Become Sexist? Analysis and Classification of Ambivalent Sexism Using Twitter Data

  • Link to publication: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/225f/f8a6a562bbb64b22cebfcd3288c6b930d1ef.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/AkshitaJha/NLP_CSS_2017
  • Task description: Hierarchy of Sexism (Benevolent sexism, Hostile sexism, None)
  • Details of task: Sexism
  • Size of dataset: 712
  • Percentage abusive: 1
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Jha, A. and Mamidi, R., 2017. When does a Compliment become Sexist? Analysis and Classification of Ambivalent Sexism using Twitter Data. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Natural Language Processing and Computational Social Science. Vancouver, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.7-16.

Overview of the Task on Automatic Misogyny Identification at IberEval 2018 (English)

  • Link to publication: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2150/overview-AMI.pdf
  • Link to data: https://amiibereval2018.wordpress.com/im nt-dates/data/
  • Task description: Binary (misogyny / not), 5 categories (stereotype, dominance, derailing, sexual harassment, discredit), target of misogyny (active or passive)
  • Details of task: Sexism
  • Size of dataset: 3,977
  • Percentage abusive: 0.47
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Fersini, E., Rosso, P. and Anzovino, M., 2018. Overview of the Task on Automatic Misogyny Identification at IberEval 2018. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Languages (IberEval 2018).

CONAN - COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speech (English)

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1271.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/marcoguerini/CONAN
  • Task description: Binary (Islamophobic / not), multi-topic (Culture, Economics, Crimes, Rapism, Terrorism, Women Oppression, History, Other/generic)
  • Details of task: Islamophobia
  • Size of dataset: 1,288
  • Percentage abusive: 1
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Synthetic / Facebook
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Chung, Y., Kuzmenko, E., Tekiroglu, S. and Guerini, M., 2019. CONAN - COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speech. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.2819-2829.

Characterizing and Detecting Hateful Users on Twitter

A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speech (Gab)

A Benchmark Dataset for Learning to Intervene in Online Hate Speech (Reddit)

Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysis (English)

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.11049
  • Link to data: https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/MLMA_hate_speech
  • Task description: Detailed taxonomy with cross-cutting attributes: Hostility, Directness, Target attribute and Target group.
  • Details of task: Gender, Sexual orientation, Religion, Disability
  • Size of dataset: 5,647
  • Percentage abusive: 0.76
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Ousidhoum, N., Lin, Z., Zhang, H., Song, Y. and Yeung, D., 2019. Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysis. ArXiv,.

Exploring Hate Speech Detection in Multimodal Publications

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1910.03814.pdf
  • Link to data: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S9mMhZFkntNnYdO-1dZXwF_8XIiFcmlF/view
  • Task description: Multimodal Hate Speech Detection, including six primary categories (No attacks to any community, Racist, Sexist, Homophobic, Religion based attack, Attack to other community)
  • Details of task: Racism, Sexism, Homophobia, Religion-based attack
  • Size of dataset: 149,823
  • Percentage abusive: 0.25
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text and Images/Memes
  • Reference: Gomez, R., Gibert, J., Gomez, L. and Karatzas, D., 2020. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision (pp. 1470-1478).

Predicting the Type and Target of Offensive Posts in Social Media

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.09666.pdf
  • Link to data: [http://competitions.codalab.org/ competitions/20011](http://competitions.codalab.org/ competitions/20011)
  • Task description: Branching structure of tasks: Binary (Offensive, Not), Within Offensive (Target, Not), Within Target (Individual, Group, Other)
  • Details of task: Group-directed + Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 14,100
  • Percentage abusive: 0.33
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Zampieri, M., Malmasi, S., Nakov, P., Rosenthal, S., Farra, N. and Kumar, R., 2019. SemEval-2019 Task 6: Identifying and Categorizing Offensive Language in Social Media (OffensEval). ArXiv,.

hatEval, SemEval-2019 Task 5: Multilingual Detection of Hate Speech Against Immigrants and Women in Twitter (English)

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/S19-2007
  • Link to data: http://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/19935
  • Task description: Branching structure of tasks: Binary (Hate, Not), Within Hate (Group, Individual), Within Hate (Agressive, Not)
  • Details of task: Group-directed + Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 13,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.4
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Basile, V., Bosco, C., Fersini, E., Nozza, D., Patti, V., Pardo, F., Rosso, P. and Sanguinetti, M., 2019. SemEval-2019 Task 5: Multilingual Detection of Hate Speech Against Immigrants and Women in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.54-63.

Peer to Peer Hate: Hate Speech Instigators and Their Targets

  • Link to publication: https://aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM18/paper/view/17905/16996
  • Link to data: https://github.com/mayelsherif/hate_speech_icwsm18
  • Task description: Binary (Hate/Not), only for tweets which have both a Hate Instigator and Hate Target
  • Details of task: Hate per se
  • Size of dataset: 27,330
  • Percentage abusive: 0.98
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: ElSherief, M., Nilizadeh, S., Nguyen, D., Vigna, G. and Belding, E., 2018. Peer to Peer Hate: Hate Speech Instigators and Their Targets. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2018). Santa Barbara, California: University of California, pp.52-61.

Overview of the HASOC track at FIRE 2019: Hate Speech and Offensive Content Identification in Indo-European Languages

  • Link to publication: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3368567.3368584?download=true
  • Link to data: https://hasocfire.github.io/hasoc/2019/dataset.html
  • Task description: Branching structure of tasks. A: Hate / Offensive or Neither, B: Hatespeech, Offensive, or Profane, C: Targeted or Untargeted
  • Details of task: Group-directed + Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 7,005
  • Percentage abusive: 0.36
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter and Facebook
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Mandl, T., Modha, S., Majumder, P., Patel, D., Dave, M., Mandlia, C. and Patel, A., 2019. Overview of the HASOC track at FIRE 2019. In: Proceedings of the 11th Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation,.

Detecting East Asian Prejudice on Social media

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.alw-1.19.pdf
  • Link to data: https://zenodo.org/record/3816667
  • Task description: Task 1: Thematic annotation (East Asia/Covid-19) Task 2: Primary category annotation: 1) Hostility against an East Asian (EA) entity 2) Criticism of an East Asian entity 3) Counter speech 5) Discussion of East Asian prejudice 5) Non-related. Task 3: Secondary category annotation (if (1) or (2) - identifying what East Asian entity was targeted + if (1) interpersonal abuse/threatening language/dehumanization).
  • Details of task: Detecting East Asian prejudice
  • Size of dataset: 20,000
  • Percentage abusive: 27% (Hostility, 19.5%; Criticism, 7.2%)
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Post
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Vidgen, B., Botelho, A., Broniatowski, D., Guest, E., Hall, M., Margetts, H., Tromble, R., Waseem, Z. and Hale, S., Detecting East Asian Prejudice on Social media, 2020, In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms, pp.162–172

Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behavior

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.00393.pdf
  • Link to data: https://dataverse.mpi-sws.org/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.5072/FK2/ZDTEMN
  • Task description: Multi-thematic (Abusive, Hateful, Normal, Spam)
  • Details of task: Hate per se
  • Size of dataset: 80,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.18
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Annotation process: Very detailed information is given: multiple rounds, using a smaller 300 tweet dataset for testing the schema. For the final 80k, 5 judgements per tweet. CrowdFlower
  • Annotation agreement: 55.9% = 4/5, 36.6% = 3/5, 7.5% = 2/5
  • Reference: Founta, A., Djouvas, C., Chatzakou, D., Leontiadis, I., Blackburn, J., Stringhini, G., Vakali, A., Sirivianos, M. and Kourtellis, N., 2018. Large Scale Crowdsourcing and Characterization of Twitter Abusive Behavior. ArXiv,.

A Large Labeled Corpus for Online Harassment Research

  • Link to publication: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~golbeck/papers/trolling.pdf
  • Link to data: jgolbeck@umd.edu
  • Task description: Binary (Harassment, Not)
  • Details of task: Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 35,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.16
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Golbeck, J., Ashktorab, Z., Banjo, R., Berlinger, A., Bhagwan, S., Buntain, C., Cheakalos, P., Geller, A., Gergory, Q., Gnanasekaran, R., Gnanasekaran, R., Hoffman, K., Hottle, J., Jienjitlert, V., Khare, S., Lau, R., Martindale, M., Naik, S., Nixon, H., Ramachandran, P., Rogers, K., Rogers, L., Sarin, M., Shahane, G., Thanki, J., Vengataraman, P., Wan, Z. and Wu, D., 2017. A Large Labeled Corpus for Online Harassment Research. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference. New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp.229-233.

Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale, Personal attacks

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.08914
  • Link to data: https://github.com/ewulczyn/wiki-detox
  • Task description: Binary (Personal attack, Not)
  • Details of task: Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 115,737
  • Percentage abusive: 0.12
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Wikipedia
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Wulczyn, E., Thain, N. and Dixon, L., 2017. Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale. ArXiv,.

Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale, Toxicity

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.08914
  • Link to data: https://github.com/ewulczyn/wiki-detox
  • Task description: Toxicity/healthiness judgement (-2 == very toxic, 0 == neutral, 2 == very healthy)
  • Details of task: Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 100,000
  • Percentage abusive: NA
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Wikipedia
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Wulczyn, E., Thain, N. and Dixon, L., 2017. Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale. ArXiv,.

Detecting cyberbullying in online communities (World of Warcraft)

  • Link to publication: http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/61/
  • Link to data: http://ub-web.de/research/
  • Task description: Binary (Harassment, Not)
  • Details of task: Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 16,975
  • Percentage abusive: 0.01
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: World of Warcraft
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Bretschneider, U. and Peters, R., 2016. Detecting Cyberbullying in Online Communities. Research Papers, 61.

Detecting cyberbullying in online communities (League of Legends)

  • Link to publication: http://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/61/
  • Link to data: http://ub-web.de/research/
  • Task description: Binary (Harassment, Not)
  • Details of task: Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 17,354
  • Percentage abusive: 0.01
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: League of Legends
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Bretschneider, U. and Peters, R., 2016. Detecting Cyberbullying in Online Communities. Research Papers, 61.

A Quality Type-aware Annotated Corpus and Lexicon for Harassment Research

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1802.09416.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/Mrezvan94/Harassment-Corpus
  • Task description: Multi-topic harassment detection
  • Details of task: Racism, Sexism, Appearance-related, Intellectual, Political
  • Size of dataset: 24,189
  • Percentage abusive: 0.13
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Rezvan, M., Shekarpour, S., Balasuriya, L., Thirunarayan, K., Shalin, V. and Sheth, A., 2018. A Quality Type-aware Annotated Corpus and Lexicon for Harassment Research. ArXiv,.

Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale, Aggression and Friendliness

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1610.08914
  • Link to data: https://github.com/ewulczyn/wiki-detox
  • Task description: Aggression/friendliness judgement on a 5 point scale. (-2 == very aggressive, 0 == neutral, 3 == very friendly).
  • Details of task: Person-Directed + Group-Directed
  • Size of dataset: 160,000
  • Percentage abusive: NA
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Wikipedia
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Wulczyn, E., Thain, N. and Dixon, L., 2017. Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale. ArXiv,.

Are Chess Discussions Racist? An Adversarial Hate Speech Data Set

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.10280.pdf
  • Link to data: https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~akhudabu/Chess.html
  • Task description: Not Labeled
  • Details of task: Racism, Misclassification
  • Size of dataset: 1,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.0
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Youtube
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Rupak Sarkar and Ashiqur R. KhudaBukhsh, Nov. 2020. Are Chess Discussions Racist? An Adversarial Hate Speech Data Set. In: The Thirty-Fifth {AAAI} Conference on Artificial Intelligence, {AAAI} 2021

ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Dataset (Binary)

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.08328.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/intelligence-csd-auth-gr/Ethos-Hate-Speech-Dataset
  • Task description: Binary (Hate, Not)
  • Details of task: Gender, Race, National Origin, Disability, Religion, Sexual Orientation
  • Size of dataset: 998
  • Percentage abusive: 0.43
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Youtube, Reddit
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Mollas, I., Chrysopoulou, Z., Karlos, S., and Tsoumakas, G., 2021. ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Dataset. Complex & Intelligent Systems, Jan. 2022

ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Dataset (Multi label)

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.08328.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/intelligence-csd-auth-gr/Ethos-Hate-Speech-Dataset
  • Task description: 8 Categories (Violence, Directed/Undirected, Gender, Race, National Origin, Disability, Sexual Orientation, Religion)
  • Details of task: Gender, Race, National Origin, Disability, Religion, Sexual Orientation
  • Size of dataset: 433
  • Percentage abusive: 0.33
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Youtube, Reddit
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Mollas, I., Chrysopoulou, Z., Karlos, S., and Tsoumakas, G., 2021. ETHOS: an Online Hate Speech Detection Dataset. Complex & Intelligent Systems, Jan. 2022

Twitter Sentiment Analysis

Toxicity Detection in Software Engineering: Automated Identification of Toxic Code Reviews Using ToxiCR

  • Link to publication: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3583562
  • Link to data: https://github.com/WSU-SEAL/ToxiCR
  • Task description: Binary (Toxic, Non-toxic)
  • Details of task: Toxicity, Context
  • Size of dataset: 19,671
  • Percentage of toxic: 19
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Code Review Comments
  • Platform: Open Source Software
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Sarker, Jaydeb, Asif Kamal Turzo, Ming Dong, and Amiangshu Bosu. "Automated Identification of Toxic Code Reviews Using ToxiCR." ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (2023).

Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter? CAT-LARGE (No Context)

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.00998.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/ipavlopoulos/context_toxicity
  • Task description: Binary (Toxic, Non-toxic)
  • Details of task: Toxicity, Context
  • Size of dataset: 10,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.006
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Post
  • Platform: Wikipedia Talk Pages
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Pavlopoulos, J., Sorensen, J., Dixon, L., Thain, N., & Androutsopoulos, I. (2020). Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter? ArXiv:2006.00998 [Cs].

Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter? CAT-LARGE (With Context)

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2006.00998.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/ipavlopoulos/context_toxicity
  • Task description: Binary (Toxic, Non-toxic)
  • Details of task: Toxicity, Context
  • Size of dataset: 10,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.02
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Post
  • Platform: Wikipedia Talk Pages
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Pavlopoulos, J., Sorensen, J., Dixon, L., Thain, N., & Androutsopoulos, I. (2020). Toxicity Detection: Does Context Really Matter? ArXiv:2006.00998 [Cs].

Anatomy of Online Hate: Developing a Taxonomy and Machine Learning Models for Identifying and Classifying Hate in Online News Media

  • Link to publication: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM18/paper/viewFile/17885/17024
  • Link to data: https://www.dropbox.com/s/21wtzy9arc5skr8/ICWSM18%20-%20SALMINEN%20ET%20AL.xlsx?dl=0
  • Task description: Binary (Hate, Not), Multinomial classification (21 categories divided into 'hateful language', 'hate targets' and 'hate sub-targets')
  • Details of task: Group-directed + Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 5,143
  • Percentage abusive: 82%
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Comment
  • Platform: YouTube and Facebook
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Salminen, J., Almerekhi, H., Milenković, M., Jung, S., An, J., Kwak, H. and Jansen, B., 2018, Anatomy of Online Hate: Developing a Taxonomy and Machine Learning Models for Identifying and Classifying Hate in Online News Media, In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2018), pp.330-339

Estonian

Automating News Comment Moderation with Limited Resources: Benchmarking in Croatian and Estonian

  • Link to publication: https://jlcl.org/content/2-allissues/1-heft1-2020/jlcl_2020-1_3.pdf
  • Link to data: http://hdl.handle.net/11356/1401
  • Task description: Binary (Deleted, Not)
  • Details of task: Flagged content performmed by the real newspaper moderators
  • Size of dataset: 31.5M
  • Percentage abusive: 12.5%
  • Language: Estonian (some in Russian also)
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Newspaper comments
  • Platform: Eesti Ekspress (www.ekspress.ee) website
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Ravi Shekhar, Marko Pranjić, Senja Pollak, Andraž Pelicon, Matthew Purver (2020). Automating News Comment Moderation with Limited Resources: Benchmarking in Croatian and Estonian. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics (JLCL).

HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detection

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.10289.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/punyajoy/HateXplain
  • Task description: Binary (Hate, Not) and Three-class (Hate speech, Offensive language, None)
  • Details of task: Hatespeech detection on social media in English, including 10 categories: African, Islam, Jewish, LGBTQ, Women, Refugee, Arab, Caucasian, Hispanic, Asian
  • Size of dataset: 20148
  • Percentage abusive: 57%
  • Language: English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter and Gab
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Mathew, B., Saha, P., Yimam, S. M., Biemann, C., Goyal, P., & Mukherjee, A. (2020). Hatexplain: A benchmark dataset for explainable hate speech detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.10289.

French

CONAN - COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speech (French)

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1271.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/marcoguerini/CONAN
  • Task description: Binary (Islamophobic / not), Multi-topic (Culture, Economics, Crimes, Rapism, Terrorism, Women Oppression, History, Other/generic)
  • Details of task: Islamophobia
  • Size of dataset: 1,719
  • Percentage abusive: 1
  • Language: French
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Synthetic / Facebook
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Chung, Y., Kuzmenko, E., Tekiroglu, S. and Guerini, M., 2019. CONAN - COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speech. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.2819-2829.

Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysis (French)

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.11049
  • Link to data: https://github.com/HKUST-KnowComp/MLMA_hate_speech
  • Task description: Detailed taxonomy with cross-cutting attributes: Hostility, Directness, Target Attribute, Target Group, How annotators felt on seeing the tweet.
  • Details of task: Gender, Sexual orientation, Religion, Disability
  • Size of dataset: 4,014
  • Percentage abusive: 0.72
  • Language: French
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Ousidhoum, N., Lin, Z., Zhang, H., Song, Y. and Yeung, D., 2019. Multilingual and Multi-Aspect Hate Speech Analysis. ArXiv,.

CyberAgressionAdo-v1

  • Link to publication: (url) - link to the documentation and/or a data statement about the data
  • Link to data: (url) - direct download is preferred, e.g. a link straight to a .zip file
  • Task description: The collected conversations have been annotated using a considering several layers, as the participant roles, the presence of hate speech, the type of verbal abuse present in the message, and whether utterances use different humour figurative devices (e.g., sarcasm or irony).
  • Details of task: This dataset allows to perform several subtasks related to the task of online hate detection in a conversational setting (hate speech detection, bullying participant role detection, verbal abuse detection, etc.)
  • Size of dataset: 19 conversations
  • Language: French
  • Level of annotation: exchanged messages
  • Platform: collected from role playing games mimicking cyberagression situations occuring on private instant messaging platforms.
  • Medium: text (csv)
  • Reference: Anaïs Ollagnier, Elena Cabrio, Serena Villata, Catherine Blaya. CyberAgressionAdo-v1: a Dataset of Annotated Online Aggressions in French Collected through a Role-playing Game. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, Jun 2022, Marseille, France. ⟨hal-03765860⟩

German

RP-Mod & RP-Crowd: Moderator- and Crowd-Annotated German News Comment Datasets

  • Link to publication: https://datasets-benchmarks-proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2021/file/c9e1074f5b3f9fc8ea15d152add07294-Paper-round2.pdf
  • Link to data: https://zenodo.org/record/5291339#.Ybr_9VkxkUE
  • Task description: Binary (Offensive or Not), Multi-class/-label (sexism, racism, threats, insults, profane language, meta, advertisement).
  • Details of task: The comments originate from a large German newspaper and are annotated by professional moderators (community managers). Additionally, each comment was further annotated by five different crowd-workers.
  • Size of dataset: 85,000
  • Percentage abusive: 8.4%
  • Language: German
  • Level of annotation: Comments
  • Platform: German Newspaper (Rheinische Post)
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Assenmacher, D., Niemann, M., Müller, K., Seiler, M., Riehle, D. M., & Trautmann, H. (2021). RP-Mod & RP-Crowd: Moderator- and crowd-annotated german news comment datasets. In Proceedings of the Neural Information Processing Systems Track on Datasets and Benchmark.

Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisis

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1701.08118.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/UCSM-DUE/IWG_hatespeech_public
  • Task description: Binary (Anti-refugee hate, None)
  • Details of task: Refugees
  • Size of dataset: 469
  • Percentage abusive: NA
  • Language: German
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Ross, B., Rist, M., Carbonell, G., Cabrera, B., Kurowsky, N. and Wojatzki, M., 2017. Measuring the Reliability of Hate Speech Annotations: The Case of the European Refugee Crisis. ArXiv,.

Detecting Offensive Statements Towards Foreigners in Social Media

  • Link to publication: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/23dc/df7c7e82807445afd9f19474fc0a3d8169fe.pdf
  • Link to data: http://ub-web.de/research/
  • Task description: Hierarchical (Anti-foreigner prejudice, split into (1) slightly offensive/offensive and (2) explicitly/substantially offensive). 6 targets (Foreigner, Government, Press, Community, Other, Unknown)
  • Details of task: Anti-foreigner prejudice
  • Size of dataset: 5,836
  • Percentage abusive: 0.11
  • Language: German
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Facebook
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Bretschneider, U. and Peters, R., 2017. Detecting Offensive Statements towards Foreigners in Social Media. In: Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

GermEval 2018

Overview of the HASOC track at FIRE 2019: Hate Speech and Offensive Content Identification in Indo-European Languages

  • Link to publication: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3368567.3368584?download=true
  • Link to data: https://hasocfire.github.io/hasoc/2019/dataset.html
  • Task description: A: Hate / Offensive or neither, B: Hatespeech, Offensive, or Profane
  • Details of task: Group-directed + Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 4,669
  • Percentage abusive: 0.24
  • Language: German
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter and Facebook
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Mandl, T., Modha, S., Majumder, P., Patel, D., Dave, M., Mandlia, C. and Patel, A., 2019. Overview of the HASOC track at FIRE 2019. In: Proceedings of the 11th Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation,.

Greek

Deep Learning for User Comment Moderation, Flagged Comments

Deep Learning for User Comment Moderation, Moderated Comments

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W17-3004
  • Link to data: http://www.straintek.com/data/
  • Task description: Binary (Flagged, Not)
  • Details of task: Flagged content
  • Size of dataset: 1,500
  • Percentage abusive: 0.22
  • Language: Greek
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Gazetta
  • Medium: text
  • Reference: Pavlopoulos, J., Malakasiotis, P. and Androutsopoulos, I., 2017. Deep Learning for User Comment Moderation. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online. Vancouver, Canada: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.25-35.

Offensive Language Identification in Greek

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.07459v1.pdf
  • Link to data: https://sites.google.com/site/offensevalsharedtask/home
  • Task description: Branching structure of tasks: Binary (Offensive, Not), Within Offensive (Target, Not), Within Target (Individual, Group, Other)
  • Details of task: Group-directed + Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 4779
  • Percentage abusive: 0.29
  • Language: Greek
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Pitenis, Z., Zampieri, M. and Ranasinghe, T., 2020. Offensive Language Identification in Greek. ArXiv.
  • Dataset reader: 🤗 strombergnlp/offenseval_2020

Hindi / Hindi-English

Hostility Detection Dataset in Hindi

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.03588.pdf
  • Link to data: https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/26654
  • Task description: Branching structure of tasks: Binary (Hostile, Not Hostile), Multi-tags within Hostile (Fake News, Hate, Offense, Defame)
  • Details of task: Hostility detection
  • Size of dataset: 8,192
  • Percentage abusive: 47%
  • Language: Hindi
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Bhardwaj, M., Akhtar, M.S., Ekbal, A., Das, A. and Chakraborty, T., 2020. Hostility detection dataset in hindi. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.03588.

Aggression-annotated Corpus of Hindi-English Code-mixed Data

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.09402
  • Link to data: https://github.com/kraiyani/Facebook-Post-Aggression-Identification
  • Task description: 3 part hierachy for hate (None, Covert Aggression, Overt Aggression), 4 part target categorisation (Physical threat, Sexual threat, Identity threat, Non-threatening aggression), 3-part discursive role categorisation (Attack, Defend, Abet)
  • Details of task: Numerous sub-categorizations
  • Size of dataset: 18,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.06
  • Language: Hindi-English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Facebook
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Kumar, R., Reganti, A., Bhatia, A. and Maheshwari, T., 2018. Aggression-annotated Corpus of Hindi-English Code-mixed Data. ArXiv,.

Aggression-annotated Corpus of Hindi-English Code-mixed Data

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1803.09402
  • Link to data: https://github.com/kraiyani/Facebook-Post-Aggression-Identification
  • Task description: 3 part hierachy for hate (None, Covert Aggression, Overt Aggression), 4 part target categorisation (Physical threat, Sexual threat, Identity threat, Non-threatening aggression), 3-part discursive role categorisation (Attack, Defend, Abet)
  • Details of task: Numerous sub-categorizations
  • Size of dataset: 21,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.27
  • Language: Hindi-English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Kumar, R., Reganti, A., Bhatia, A. and Maheshwari, T., 2018. Aggression-annotated Corpus of Hindi-English Code-mixed Data. ArXiv,.

Did You Offend Me? Classification of Offensive Tweets in Hinglish Language

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W18-5118
  • Link to data: https://github.com/pmathur5k10/Hinglish-Offensive-Text-Classification
  • Task description: Hierarchy (Not Offensive, Abusive, Hate)
  • Details of task: Sexism
  • Size of dataset: 3,189
  • Percentage abusive: 0.65
  • Language: Hindi-English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Mathur, P., Sawhney, R., Ayyar, M. and Shah, R., 2018. Did you offend me? Classification of Offensive Tweets in Hinglish Language. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2). Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.138-148.

A Dataset of Hindi-English Code-Mixed Social Media Text for Hate Speech Detection

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W18-1105
  • Link to data: https://github.com/deepanshu1995/HateSpeech-Hindi-English-Code-Mixed-Social-Media-Text
  • Task description: Binary (Hate, Not)
  • Details of task: Hate per se
  • Size of dataset: 4,575
  • Percentage abusive: 0.36
  • Language: Hindi-English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Bohra, A., Vijay, D., Singh, V., Sarfaraz Akhtar, S. and Shrivastava, M., 2018. A Dataset of Hindi-English Code-Mixed Social Media Text for Hate Speech Detection. In: Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Computational Modeling of People’s Opinions, Personality, and Emotions in Social Media. New Orleans, Louisiana: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.36-41.

Overview of the HASOC track at FIRE 2019: Hate Speech and Offensive Content Identification in Indo-European Languages

  • Link to publication: https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3368567.3368584?download=true
  • Link to data: https://hasocfire.github.io/hasoc/2019/dataset.htm
  • Task description: A: Hate, Offensive or Neither, B: Hatespeech, Offensive, or Profane, C: Targeted or Untargeted
  • Details of task: Group-directed + Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 5,983
  • Percentage abusive: 0.51
  • Language: Hindi
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter and Facebook
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Mandl, T., Modha, S., Majumder, P., Patel, D., Dave, M., Mandlia, C. and Patel, A., 2019. Overview of the HASOC track at FIRE 2019. In: Proceedings of the 11th Forum for Information Retrieval Evaluation,.

Indonesian

Hate Speech Detection in the Indonesian Language: A Dataset and Preliminary Study

  • Link to publication: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8355039
  • Link to data: https://github.com/ialfina/id-hatespeech-detection
  • Task description: Binary (Hate, Not)
  • Details of task: Hate per se
  • Size of dataset: 713
  • Percentage abusive: 0.36
  • Language: Indonesian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Alfina, I., Mulia, R., Fanany, M. and Ekanata, Y., 2017. Hate Speech Detection in the Indonesian Language: A Dataset and Preliminary Study. In: International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems. pp.233-238.

Multi-Label Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection in Indonesian Twitter

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-3506
  • Link to data: https://github.com/okkyibrohim/id-multi-label-hate-speech-and-abusive-language-detection
  • Task description: (No hate speech, No hate speech but abusive, Hate speech but no abuse, Hate speech and abuse), within hate, category (Religion/creed, Race/ethnicity, Physical/disability, Gender/sexual orientation, Other invective/slander), within hate, strength (Weak, Moderate and Strong)
  • Details of task: Religion, Race, Disability, Gender
  • Size of dataset: 13,169
  • Percentage abusive: 0.42
  • Language: Indonesian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Okky Ibrohim, M. and Budi, I., 2019. Multi-label Hate Speech and Abusive Language Detection in Indonesian Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online. Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.46-57.

A Dataset and Preliminaries Study for Abusive Language Detection in Indonesian Social Media

Korean

BEEP! Korean Corpus of Online News Comments for Toxic Speech Detection__

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.socialnlp-1.4
  • Link to data: https://github.com/kocohub/korean-hate-speech
  • Task description: Binary (Gender bias, No gender bias), Ternary (Gender bias, Other biases, None), Ternary (Hate, Offensive, None)
  • Details of task: Person/Group-directed, Gender/Sexual orientation, Sexism, Harmfulness/Toxicity
  • Size of dataset: 9,381
  • Percentage abusive: 33.87 (Bias), 57.77 (Toxicity)
  • Language: Korean
  • Level of annotation: Comments
  • Platform: NAVER entertainment news
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Moon, J., Cho, W. I., and Lee, J., 2020. BEEP! Korean Corpus of Online News Comments for Toxic Speech Detection. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media Month: July. Online: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.25-31.

Latvian

Latvian newspaper user comment dataset

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2021.hackashop-1.14.pdf
  • Link to data: https://www.clarin.si/repository/xmlui/handle/11356/1407
  • Task description: Binary (Deleted, Not)
  • Details of task: Flagged content performmed by the real newspaper moderators
  • Size of dataset: 12M
  • Percentage abusive: ~10%
  • Language: Latvian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Newspaper comments
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Senja Pollak, Marko Robnik-Šikonja, Matthew Purver, Michele Boggia, Ravi Shekhar, Marko Pranjić, Salla Salmela, Ivar Krustok, Tarmo Paju, Carl-Gustav Linden, Leo Leppänen, Elaine Zosa, Matej Ulčar, Linda Freiental, Silver Traat, Luis Adrián Cabrera-Diego, Matej Martinc, Nada Lavrač, Blaž Škrlj, Martin Žnidaršič, Andraž Pelicon, Boshko Koloski, Vid Podečan, Janez Kranjc, Shane Sheehan, Emanuela Boros, Jose Moreno, Antoine Doucet, Hannu Toivonen (2021). EMBEDDIA Tools, Datasets and Challenges: Resources and Hackathon Contributions. Proceedings of the Hackashop on News Media Content Analysis and Automated Report Generation (EACL).

Italian

An Italian Twitter Corpus of Hate Speech against Immigrants

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/L18-1443
  • Link to data: https://github.com/msang/hate-speech-corpus
  • Task description: Binary (Immigrants/Roma/Muslims, Not), additional categories. Within Hate, Intensity measurement (Aggressiveness: No, Weak, Strong, Offensiveness: No, Weak, Strong, Irony: No, Yes, Stereotype: No, Yes, Incitement degree: 0-4)
  • Details of task: Immigrants, Roma and Muslims + numerous sub-categorizations
  • Size of dataset: 1,827
  • Percentage abusive: 0.13
  • Language: Italian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Sanguinetti, M., Poletto, F., Bosco, C., Patti, V. and Stranisci, M., 2018. An Italian Twitter Corpus of Hate Speech against Immigrants. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018). Miyazaki, Japan: European Language Resources Association (ELRA).

Overview of the EVALITA 2018 Hate Speech Detection Task (Facebook)

  • Link to publication: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2263/paper010.pdf
  • Link to data: http://www.di.unito.it/~tutreeb/haspeede-evalita18/data.html
  • Task description: Binary (Hate, Not), Within hate for Facebook only, strength (No hate, Weak hate, Strong hate) and theme ((1) religion, (2) physical and/or mental handicap, (3) socio-economic status, (4) politics, (5) race, (6) sex and gender, (7) Other)
  • Details of task: Religion, physical and/or mental handicap, socio-economic status, politics, race, sex and gender
  • Size of dataset: 4,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.51
  • Language: Italian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Facebook
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Bosco, C., Dell'Orletta, F. and Poletto, F., 2018. Overview of the EVALITA 2018 Hate Speech Detection Task. In: EVALITA 2018-Sixth Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian. CEUR, pp.1-9.

Overview of the EVALITA 2018 Hate Speech Detection Task (Twitter)

  • Link to publication: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2263/paper010.pdf
  • Link to data: http://www.di.unito.it/~tutreeb/haspeede-evalita18/data.html
  • Task description: Binary (Hate, Not), Within Hate For Twitter only Intensity (1-4 rating), Aggressiveness (No, Weak, Strong), Offensiveness (No, Weak, Strong), Irony (Yes, No)
  • Details of task: Group-directed
  • Size of dataset: 4,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.32
  • Language: Italian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Bosco, C., Dell'Orletta, F. and Poletto, F., 2018. Overview of the EVALITA 2018 Hate Speech Detection Task. In: EVALITA 2018-Sixth Evaluation Campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech Tools for Italian. CEUR, pp.1-9.

Automatic Misogyny Identification (AMI) at Evalita 2020

  • Link to publication: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2765/paper161.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/dnozza/ami2020
  • Task description: Binary (misogyny / not), Binary (aggressive / not), Binary on synthetic fairness test (misogyny / not)
  • Details of task: Sexism
  • Size of dataset: 6,000 and 1,961 (synthetic fairness test)
  • Percentage abusive: 47% and 50% (synthetic fairness test)
  • Language: Italian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Fersini, E., Nozza, D., and Rosso, P., 2020. AMI @ EVALITA2020: Automatic Misogyny Identification. In: Proceedings of the 7th evaluation campaign of Natural Language Processing and Speech tools for Italian (EVALITA 2020).

CONAN - COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speech (Italian)

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1271.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/marcoguerini/CONAN
  • Task description: Binary (Islamophobic, Not), Multi-topic (Culture, Economics, Crimes, Rapism, Terrorism, Women Oppression, History, Other/generic)
  • Details of task: Islamophobia
  • Size of dataset: 1,071
  • Percentage abusive: 1
  • Language: Italian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Synthetic / Facebook
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Chung, Y., Kuzmenko, E., Tekiroglu, S. and Guerini, M., 2019. CONAN - COunter NArratives through Nichesourcing: a Multilingual Dataset of Responses to Fight Online Hate Speech. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.2819-2829.

Creating a WhatsApp Dataset to Study Pre-teen Cyberbullying

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W18-5107
  • Link to data: https://github.com/dhfbk/WhatsApp-Dataset
  • Task description: Binary (Cyberbullying, Not)
  • Details of task: Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 14,600
  • Percentage abusive: 0.08
  • Language: Italian
  • Level of annotation: Posts, structured into 10 chats, with token level information
  • Platform: Synthetic / Whatsapp
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Sprugnoli, R., Menini, S., Tonelli, S., Oncini, F. and Piras, E., 2018. Creating a WhatsApp Dataset to Study Pre-teen Cyberbullying. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2) Month: October. Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.51-59.

Polish

Results of the PolEval 2019 Shared Task 6:First Dataset and Open Shared Task for Automatic Cyberbullying Detection in Polish Twitter

  • Link to publication: http://poleval.pl/files/poleval2019.pdf
  • Link to data: http://poleval.pl/tasks/task6
  • Task description: Harmfulness score (three values), Multilabel from seven phenomena
  • Details of task: Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 10,041
  • Percentage abusive: 0.09
  • Language: Polish
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Ogrodniczuk, M. and Kobyliński, L., 2019. Results of the PolEval 2019 Shared Task 6: First Dataset and Open Shared Task for Automatic Cyberbullying Detection in Polish Twitter. In: Proceedings of the PolEval 2019 Workshop. Warszawa: Institute of Computer Science, Polish Academy of Sciences.

Portuguese

Toxic Language Dataset for Brazilian Portuguese (ToLD-Br)

  • Link to publication: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.04543
  • Link to data: https://github.com/JAugusto97/ToLD-Br
  • Task description: Multiclass (LGBTQ+phobia, Insult, Xenophobia, Misogyny, Obscene, Racism)
  • Details of task: Three annotators per example, demographically diverse selected annotators.
  • Size of dataset: 21.000
  • Percentage abusive: 44%
  • Language: Portuguese
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: João A. Leite, Diego F. Silva, Kalina Bontcheva, Carolina Scarton (2020): Toxic Language Detection in Social Media for Brazilian Portuguese: New Dataset and Multilingual Analysis. AACL-IJCNLP 2020

A Hierarchically-Labeled Portuguese Hate Speech Dataset

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W19-3510
  • Link to data: https://b2share.eudat.eu/records/9005efe2d6be4293b63c3cffd4cf193e
  • Task description: Binary (Hate, Not), Multi-level (81 categories, identified inductively; categories have different granularities and content can be assigned to multiple categories at once)
  • Details of task: Multiple identities inductively categorized
  • Size of dataset: 3,059
  • Percentage abusive: 0.32
  • Language: Portuguese
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Fortuna, P., Rocha da Silva, J., Soler-Company, J., Warner, L. and Nunes, S., 2019. A Hierarchically-Labeled Portuguese Hate Speech Dataset. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Abusive Language Online. Florence, Italy: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.94-104.

Offensive Comments in the Brazilian Web: A Dataset and Baseline Results

  • Link to publication: http://www.each.usp.br/digiampietri/BraSNAM/2017/p04.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/rogersdepelle/OffComBR
  • Task description: Binary (Offensive, Not), Target (Xenophobia, homophobia, sexism, racism, cursing, religious intolerance)
  • Details of task: Religion/creed, Race/ethnicity, Physical/disability, Gender/sexual orientation
  • Size of dataset: 1,250
  • Percentage abusive: 0.33
  • Language: Portuguese
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: g1.globo.com
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: de Pelle, R. and Moreira, V., 2017. Offensive Comments in the Brazilian Web: A Dataset and Baseline Results. In: VI Brazilian Workshop on Social Network Analysis and Mining. SBC.

Russian

Automatic Toxic Comment Detection in Social Media for Russian

Reducing Unintended Identity Bias in Russian Hate Speech Detection

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2020.alw-1.8.pdf
  • Link to data: License Required (Last checked 17/01/2022)
  • Task description: Binary (Hate, Not)
  • Details of task: Toxicity, Harassment, Sexism, Homophobia, Nationalism
  • Size of dataset: 100,000
  • Percentage abusive: NA
  • Language: Russian
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Youtube
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Zueva, Nadezhda, et al, Oct. 2020. Reducing Unintended Identity Bias in Russian Hate Speech Detection. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms, pages 65–69

Detection of Abusive Speech for Mixed Sociolects of Russian and Ukrainian Languages

  • Link to publication: https://nlp.fi.muni.cz/raslan/2018/paper04-Andrusyak.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/bohdan1/AbusiveLanguageDataset
  • Task description: Binary (True == Abusive, False == Not)
  • Details of task: Multilingual, Abusive Words, Political
  • Size of dataset: 2,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.33
  • Language: Surzhyk (Russian & Ukranian)
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Youtube
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Andrusyak, B., Rimel, M. and Kern, R., 2018. Detection of Abusive Speech for Mixed Sociolects of Russian and Ukrainian Languages. In: Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2018, pp. 77–84, 2018.

Russian South Park

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2021.bsnlp-1.3/
  • Link to data: https://github.com/Sariellee/Russan-Hate-speech-Recognition
  • Task description: Binary (abusive, non-abusive)
  • Details of task: Abusive language in Russian South Park scripts
  • Size of dataset: 1400
  • Percentage abusive: 22.2%
  • Language: Russian
  • Level of annotation: Sentence
  • Platform: TV Subtitles
  • Medium: text
  • Reference: Saitov & Derczynski, 2021. "Abusive Language Recognition in Russian". Proceedings of the 8th BSNLP Workshop on Balto-Slavic Natural Language Processing, ACL

Slovene

Datasets of Slovene and Croatian Moderated News Comments

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W18-5116
  • Link to data: http://hdl.handle.net/11356/1201
  • Task description: Binary (Deleted, Not)
  • Details of task: Flagged content
  • Size of dataset: 7,600,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.08
  • Language: Slovene
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: MMC RTV website
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Ljubešić, N., Erjavec, T. and Fišer, D., 2018. Datasets of Slovene and Croatian Moderated News Comments. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW2). Brussels, Belgium: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.124-131.

Spanish

Overview of MEX-A3T at IberEval 2018: Authorship and Aggressiveness Analysis in Mexican Spanish Tweets

  • Link to publication: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2150/overview-mex-a3t.pdf
  • Link to data: https://mexa3t.wixsite.com/home/aggressive-detection-track
  • Task description: Binary (Aggressive, Not)
  • Details of task: Group-directed
  • Size of dataset: 11,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.32
  • Language: Spanish
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Alvarez-Carmona, M., Guzman-Falcon, E., Montes-y-Gomez, M., Escalante, H., Villasenor-Pineda, L., Reyes-Meza, V. and Rico-Sulayes, A., 2018. Overview of MEX-A3T at IberEval 2018: Authorship and aggressiveness analysis in Mexican Spanish tweets. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Languages (IberEval 2018).

Overview of the Task on Automatic Misogyny Identification at IberEval 2018 (Spanish)

  • Link to publication: http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2150/overview-AMI.pdf
  • Link to data: https://amiibereval2018.wordpress.com/important-dates/data/
  • Task description: Binary (Misogyny, Not), 5 categories (Stereotype, Dominance, Derailing, Sexual harassment, Discredit), Target of misogyny (Active or Passive)
  • Details of task: Sexism
  • Size of dataset: 4,138
  • Percentage abusive: 0.5
  • Language: Spanish
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Fersini, E., Rosso, P. and Anzovino, M., 2018. Overview of the Task on Automatic Misogyny Identification at IberEval 2018. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Evaluation of Human Language Technologies for Iberian Languages (IberEval 2018).

hatEval, SemEval-2019 Task 5: Multilingual Detection of Hate Speech Against Immigrants and Women in Twitter (Spanish)

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/S19-2007
  • Link to data: competitions.codalab.org/competitions/19935
  • Task description: Branching structure of tasks: Binary (Hate, Not), Within Hate (Group, Individual), Within Hate (Agressive, Not)
  • Details of task: Group-directed + Person-directed
  • Size of dataset: 6,600
  • Percentage abusive: 0.4
  • Language: Spanish
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Basile, V., Bosco, C., Fersini, E., Nozza, D., Patti, V., Pardo, F., Rosso, P. and Sanguinetti, M., 2019. SemEval-2019 Task 5: Multilingual Detection of Hate Speech Against Immigrants and Women in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Minneapolis, Minnesota: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp.54-63.

Turkish

Large-Scale Hate Speech Detection with Cross-Domain Transfer

  • Link to publication: https://aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.238/
  • Link to data: https://github.com/avaapm/hatespeech
  • Task description: Three-class (Hate speech, Offensive language, None)
  • Details of task: Hate speech detection on social media (Twitter) including 5 target groups (gender, race, religion, politics, sports)
  • Size of dataset: 100k (7325 hate, 27140 offensive, 65535 none)
  • Percentage abusive: 34.5%
  • Language: Turkish
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text and image
  • Reference: Cagri Toraman, Furkan Şahinuç, Eyup Yilmaz. 2022. Large-Scale Hate Speech Detection with Cross-Domain Transfer. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 2215–2225, Marseille, France. European Language Resources Association.

A Corpus of Turkish Offensive Language on Social Media

Ukranian

Detection of Abusive Speech for Mixed Sociolects of Russian and Ukrainian Languages

  • Link to publication: https://nlp.fi.muni.cz/raslan/2018/paper04-Andrusyak.pdf
  • Link to data: https://github.com/bohdan1/AbusiveLanguageDataset
  • Task description: Binary (True == Abusive, False == Not)
  • Details of task: Multilingual, Abusive Words, Political
  • Size of dataset: 2,000
  • Percentage abusive: 0.33
  • Language: Surzhyk (Russian & Ukranian)
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Youtube
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Andrusyak, B., Rimel, M. and Kern, R., 2018. Detection of Abusive Speech for Mixed Sociolects of Russian and Ukrainian Languages. In: Proceedings of Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Language Processing, RASLAN 2018, pp. 77–84, 2018.

Urdu

Hate-Speech and Offensive Language Detection in Roman Urdu

  • Link to publication: https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.emnlp-main.197/
  • Link to data: https://github.com/haroonshakeel/roman_urdu_hate_speech
  • Task description: There are 2 subtasks, Coarse-grained Classification(Hate-Offensive vs Normal) and Fine-grained classification( Abusive/Offensive, Sexism, Religious Hate, Profane, Normal)
  • Details of task: Binary classification + Hate-Offensive label is further broken down into 4 fine-grained labels
  • Size of dataset: 10041
  • Percentage abusive: 0.24%
  • Language: Urdu-English
  • Level of annotation: Posts
  • Platform: Twitter
  • Medium: Text
  • Reference: Hammad Rizwan, Muhammad Haroon Shakeel, and Asim Karim. 2020. Hate-speech and offensive language detection in Roman Urdu. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 2512–2522, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Lists of abusive keywords

  1. The Weaponized Word

    • "The Weaponized Word offers several thousand discriminatory, derogatory and threatening terms across 125+ languages, available through a RESTful API. Access is free for most academic researchers and registered humanitarian nonprofits."
    • Data link: weaponizedword.org

  2. Hurtlex

  3. Gorrell et al.

  4. Wiegand et al.

  5. Chandrasekharan et al.

  6. Jiang et al.

How to Contribute

We accept entries to our catalogue based on pull requests to the README.md file. The dataset must be avaliable for download to be included in the list. If you want to add an entry, follow these steps!

  • Please send just one dataset addition/edit at a time - edit it in, then save. This will make everyone's life easier (including yours!)
  • Go to the README.md file and click the edit button in the top right corner of the file.

Pasted Graphic

  • Edit the markdown file. Please first go the correct language. The items are then sorted by their publication date (newest first). Add your item by copy and pasting the following template and adding all the details:
#### Title
* Link to publication: [url](url) - link to the documentation and/or a data statement about the data
* Link to data: [url](url) - direct download is preferred, e.g. a link straight to a .zip file
* Task description: How the task is framed in this data, e.g. "Binary (Hate, Not)", "Hierarchical", "Three-class (Hate speech, Offensive language, None)"
* Details of task: Free-text description of the task this data models, e.g. "Misogyny detection on social media in Danish"
* Size of dataset: Give the number of instances of abusive/non-abusive/other items
* Percentage abusive: e.g. 1.2%
* Language: e.g. Arabic
* Level of annotation: What is an "instance", in this dataset? e.g. Posts, User, Conversation, ... 
* Platform: e.g. twitter, snapchat, ..
* Medium: text / image / audio / ...
* Reference: Give a bibliographic reference for the data (if there is one), with title, author, year, venue etc
  • Check the “Preview Changes” tab to confirm everything is good to go!
  • If you’re ready to submit, propose the changes. Make sure you give some brief detail on the proposed change.

Pasted Graphic 1

  • Submit the pull request on the next page when prompted.

This page is http://hatespeechdata.com/.