Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MediaTrackSupportedConstraints.backgroundBlur #5

Closed
marcoscaceres opened this issue Jun 29, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

MediaTrackSupportedConstraints.backgroundBlur #5

marcoscaceres opened this issue Jun 29, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
from: Intel Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Intel. position: support topic: media Spec relates to audio, video, or other timed media topic: webrtc venue: W3C WebRTC WG

Comments

@marcoscaceres
Copy link
Contributor

Request for position on an emerging web specification

(Please delete inapplicable rows.)

  • WebKittens who can provide input: @youennf

Information about the spec

Design reviews and vendor positions

  • TAG Design Review:
  • Mozilla standards-positions issue:

Bugs tracking this feature

  • WebKit Bugzilla:
  • Radar:

Anything else we need to know

On WebKit-dev, @riju wrote:

This is a request for WebKit's position on adding support for Background Blur API on MediaStreamTrack.

The PR that introduced this behavior to the medicapture-extensions spec and the explainer was co-authored by
Apple engineer Youenn Fablet and approved by Jan-Ivar Bruaroey (Mozilla).

Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5077577782263808

WebRTC meeting minutes:
https://www.w3.org/2022/05/17-webrtc-minutes.html#t07

Thanks,
Riju.

@othermaciej othermaciej added topic: media Spec relates to audio, video, or other timed media topic: webrtc venue: W3C WebRTC WG labels Jun 29, 2022
@hober
Copy link
Member

hober commented Jun 30, 2022

@youennf @jernoble @eric-carlson, thoughts?

@othermaciej othermaciej added the from: Intel Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Intel. label Sep 25, 2022
@youennf
Copy link

youennf commented Oct 18, 2022

I think we are supportive, this allows exposing OS supported features in a flexible enough way to cope with OS differences. I suggest we label this as "position: support" 7 days from now.

@hober
Copy link
Member

hober commented Mar 23, 2023

Closing as we've identified our position.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
from: Intel Proposed, edited, or co-edited by Intel. position: support topic: media Spec relates to audio, video, or other timed media topic: webrtc venue: W3C WebRTC WG
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants