Enhancement: Publish prompts on page editor refer to "post" while it should be "page"

[arunsathiya]

Pre-publish prompt

🚨 Starting at a page editor, on clicking the Publish button at the top right, one can notice this text Double-check your settings, then use the button to publish your post. as a pre-publish prompt. This can be improved to Double-check your settings, then use the button to publish your page.

Result post publish/update

🚨 On a similar note, after publishing the page, it can be noticed that the result reads Post published! View post which can be updated to Page published! View page

✅ It can also be noticed that the View page button on the right is as expected.

🚨 Same can be said for updates made to a page.

[GlennMartin1]

Set to be fixed in upcoming 4.1 release.

[Soean]

The pre-publish prompt Double-check your settings, then use the button to publish your post. still is an issue in 4.1.

[danielbachhuber]

The pre-publish prompt Double-check your settings, then use the button to publish your post. still is an issue in 4.1.

We may want to re-evaluate Double-check your settings, then use the button to publish your post. as a string, as every custom post type will need to define it. Doing so seems less than ideal.

[bobbingwide]

Meanwhile, in the Tips it's the other way around. I'm editing a post and the tips talk about page.

You’ll find more settings for your page and blocks in the sidebar. Click “Settings” to open it.

Click “Preview” to load a preview of this page, so you can make sure you’re happy with your blocks.

[swissspidy]

Doing so seems less than ideal.

Agreed. What about something more general like Double-check your settings, then use the button to publish your content.?

[sarahmonster]

Making that string a bit more vague might be the right call here. There's definitely an opportunity to reduce awkwardness. We probably don't need to tell people to use a button (or if we do, we should consider improving the interface so it's more clear!)

We'll also need to reconsider: Your post will be published at the specified date and time. which suffers from the same issue.

What about instead:

Double-check your settings before publishing.
and
Your work will be published at the specified date and time.

[kristastevens]

Hello! Answering the copy review bat signal...

Since this phrase is used in multiple context, I agree that a more generic approach would be best. I love what @sarahmonster proposes above:

Double-check your settings before publishing.
and
Your work will be published at the specified date and time.