-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Advanced settings being mistaken for a heading #4871
Comments
Any thought to a shortcut to flip over to Advanced Settings? I keep finding myself annoyed every time I have to go over and click on "Block" in the sidebar. |
An interesting idea. There isn't, but I wouldn't be against one. Want to rustle up an issue @melchoyce and we can explore there? |
The "add shortcuts to menu items" issue covers shortcuts for all these. |
To solve the issue reported by the user, let's considering un-focusing the first item. This will need a workaround to suit accessibility, possibly with a hidden item. cc @afercia to work through this as we need to balance out this as it's catching users. |
Note: there are various other issue with the autofocusing (including the table of contents popover jumping to the headings). Ideally the implementation is one that moves focus to the popover (and keeps it there when you tab through) but doesn't focus the initial item. |
The discoverability of the block inspector should be improved thanks to #5882, and the focus style of the "More Options" menu is now a dotted outline rather a solid one like in the picture in the main post of this issue. Additionally, clicking on the "More Options" button does not automatically focus "Show Advanced Settings", so it should not be confused for a heading anymore. Is it safe to consider this issue fixed? |
@SuperGeniusZeb no that doesn't solve the issue here. |
Let's focus this over on #5595 for now and close. The focus is the key to resolving this fully. |
This was reported from usability testing:
https://design.oit.ncsu.edu/2018/02/02/gutenberg-testing/
As you can see it would be easy to mistake.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: