We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, thanks for you fancy work and publishing the code!
I reproduced you work with CIFAR10 dataset and calculated the energy consumption with this code (Spikingformer).
I got below outputs
SSA info: {'depth': 4, 'Nheads': 12, 'embSize': 384, 'patchSize': 4, 'Tsteps': 4} Firing rate of Q/K/V inputs in each block: [[0.14379521053803118, 0.10392173096726212, 0.08082685798783845], [0.09622804452724094, 0.079531397717663, 0.07723161116053787], [0.0788185744534565, 0.07352738761449162, 0.0678107915799829], [0.0876925362250473, 0.08682637812593315, 0.06879291607986522]] Number of operations: 0.005312266 G MACs, 0.2458512465306023 G ACs Energy consumption: 0.24570254547754208 mJ Nops: ['3703662346.0 Ops', '284837097.97817653 Ops', '1073133322.0 Ops'] Nparams: 9330874 Time cost: 0.4905501802762349 min
But, there are no accurate information about energy concumption on CIFAR10 in your paper, so I can't check if they are right values.
Can I make sure that is a properly reproduced results?
I used default config setting on cifar10.yaml i.e., Spikformer-4-384.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Hi, thanks for you fancy work and publishing the code!
I reproduced you work with CIFAR10 dataset and calculated the energy consumption with this code (Spikingformer).
I got below outputs
But, there are no accurate information about energy concumption on CIFAR10 in your paper, so I can't check if they are right values.
Can I make sure that is a properly reproduced results?
I used default config setting on cifar10.yaml i.e., Spikformer-4-384.
Thank you.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: