You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently, --num-workers is shared by both acceptors and threadless process pool. In a real world scenario, users may need to configure different number of acceptors vs threadless processes. Currently, there is a threadless process dedicated for each acceptor process.
Describe the solution you'd like
Add a --num-acceptors flag
Decouple threadless pool setup/teardown from acceptor pool class
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
This might be necessary if you are not expecting too many concurrent client requests but each request is a heavy request (e.g. file upload / file download).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Currently,
--num-workers
is shared by bothacceptors
andthreadless
process pool. In a real world scenario, users may need to configure different number of acceptors vs threadless processes. Currently, there is a threadless process dedicated for each acceptor process.Describe the solution you'd like
--num-acceptors
flagDescribe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
This might be necessary if you are not expecting too many concurrent client requests but each request is a heavy request (e.g. file upload / file download).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: