Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(renovate): ignore ESM only dependencies #487

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 20, 2021
Merged

Conversation

tripodsan
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

This PR will trigger a patch release when merged.

@tripodsan tripodsan requested a review from trieloff April 20, 2021 01:22
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 20, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #487 (62fecd0) into main (1c88759) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #487   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.91%   98.91%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        1292     1292           
  Branches      290      290           
=======================================
  Hits         1278     1278           
  Misses         14       14           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9355d42...62fecd0. Read the comment docs.

@tripodsan tripodsan merged commit 499c6f1 into main Apr 20, 2021
@tripodsan tripodsan deleted the ignore-esm-modules branch April 20, 2021 08:54
adobe-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 20, 2021
## [7.26.3](v7.26.2...v7.26.3) (2021-04-20)

### Bug Fixes

* **renovate:** ignore ESM only dependencies ([#487](#487)) ([499c6f1](499c6f1))
@adobe-bot
Copy link

🎉 This PR is included in version 7.26.3 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants