Default brand image

[overmyheadandbody]

By default, the current Milo Gnav uses a hardcoded brand image set to the one used by BACOM. This one: .

However, as the list of consumers grows, this default seems a bit opinionated, since CC/DC/etc. will have other needs.

In the FEDS version of the Gnav, a link to an image can be provided, thus allowing authors to personalise their brand image.

So my question is what should happen if an image is not provided in the brand block:

• don't render any image, one should be provided via authoring. BACOM will need to edit the Gnav brand block and provide an image, so will any new consumers;
• render the default Adobe logo, as in . BACOM will still need to edit the Gnav brand block and provide their preferred image, other consumers might be satisfied with the default.

[auniverseaway]

I'm good with either proposal, with a slight preference to the Adobe logo. Definitely not the AEC logo.

For no-touch sites (abp docs, etc.), having the Adobe logo at the top is another legitimacy indicator when we spin up a site for them.

[jmatadobe]

I prefer to render the default Adobe logo as a default option when a logo is not provided by the brand block. Bacom can author their specific logo as suggested by Rares.

[overmyheadandbody]

Thanks a lot for the input! I went with the Adobe logo fallback for everyone [0], BACOM will need to author their preferred logo after they make the switch to the FEDS Gnav.

[0] https://github.com/adobecom/milo/pull/745/files#diff-628bf5a25903978c5b36da4943ec813da171346d24bd64f80907f012a840b098R135