Skip to content

smol-toml has a Denial of Service via malicious TOML document using deeply nested inline tables

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Nov 22, 2024 in squirrelchat/smol-toml • Updated Nov 22, 2024

Package

npm smol-toml (npm)

Affected versions

<= 1.3.0

Patched versions

1.3.1

Description

Summary

An attacker can send a maliciously crafted TOML to cause the parser to crash because of a stack overflow caused by a deeply nested inline structure. A similar problem occurs when attempting to stringify deeply nested objects.

The library does not limit the maximum exploration depth while parsing or producing TOML documents, nor does it offer a way to do so.

Proof of concept

require("smol-toml").parse("e=" + "{e=".repeat(9999) + "{}" + "}".repeat(9999))

Impact

Applications which parse arbitrary TOML documents may suffer availability issues if they receive malicious input. If uncaught, the crash may cause the application itself to crash. The impact is deemed minor, as the function is already likely to throw errors on invalid input and therefore to properly handle errors.

Due to the design of most JavaScript runtimes, the uncontrolled recursion does not lead to excessive memory usage and the execution is quickly aborted.

As a reminder, it is strongly advised when working with untrusted user input to expect errors to occur and to appropriately catch them.

Patches

Version 1.3.1 offers a mechanism to limit the exploration depth before halting with a TomlError when parsing, with a default cap of 1000. A same mechanism has been implemented for stringifying objects.

Please note that the parser will still throw an error upon such cases. It is, however, a now-controlled and documented behavior of the library.

Workarounds

Wrap all invocations of parse and stringify in a try/catch block.

References

@cyyynthia cyyynthia published to squirrelchat/smol-toml Nov 22, 2024
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Nov 22, 2024
Reviewed Nov 22, 2024
Last updated Nov 22, 2024

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Weaknesses

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-pqhp-25j4-6hq9

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.