Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Source Iterable: add new endpoints #5574

Closed
emily-hawkins opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5915
Closed

Source Iterable: add new endpoints #5574

emily-hawkins opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 2 comments · Fixed by #5915

Comments

@emily-hawkins
Copy link

Tell us about the problem you're trying to solve

We are considering switching from bringing in iterable data from fivetran to airbyte. We need some additional iterable endpoints available for that to happen.

These exist in fivetran (https://fivetran.com/docs/applications/iterable)

Describe the solution you’d like

Add these additional endpoints to the iterable connector

Describe the alternative you’ve considered or used

staying with fivetran

Additional context

Are you willing to submit a PR?

no

@emily-hawkins emily-hawkins added the type/enhancement New feature or request label Aug 23, 2021
@marcosmarxm marcosmarxm changed the title Additional Iterable endpoints Source Iterable: add new endpoints Aug 24, 2021
@marcosmarxm marcosmarxm added the area/connectors Connector related issues label Aug 24, 2021
@marcosmarxm
Copy link
Member

thanks for requesting this @emilyhawkins-drizly I added this to the connector roadmap backlog.

@gaart
Copy link
Contributor

gaart commented Oct 4, 2021

@emilyhawkins-drizly

We just merged this feature into master and released a new version of the connector.

Upgrade your connector to version 0.1.8 and get started. To upgrade your connector version, go to the admin panel in the left hand side of the UI, find this connector in the list, and input the latest connector version.

Please let us know if you have any further questions.

Enjoy!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

6 participants