Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[EPIC] Improve Snowflake destination to satisfy General Availability criteria #9352

Closed
sherifnada opened this issue Jan 7, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@sherifnada
Copy link
Contributor

Tell us about the problem you're trying to solve

GA criteria described here require that a connector achieve a good degree of reliability. This epic is a placeholder for any work required to improve the Snowflake destination such that it achieves GA status. Some things to keep in mind:

  1. Measurement & visibility: we'll need to have a way to measure how well this connector is doing in the wild, and some sort of error reporting to reliably make improvements. These are captured by the following issues Experiment with Sentry performance monitoring for BigQuery destination #9328 and Setup analytics project for tracking metrics #8638
  2. Absent measurement & visibility we could look at open issues for guidance, including snowflake's recommended best practices

Describe the solution you’d like

Snowflake in GA

@sherifnada
Copy link
Contributor Author

sherifnada commented Jan 12, 2022

next steps:

  • catalogue all open issues, determine which ones need to happen for GA - Done by Andy here
  • sync up w liren about the benchmark work and whether it overlaps for snowflake GA - Liren will finish his benchmark work and then we can start with benchmarking
  • other items to figure out what is needed to get Snowflake into GA - Identified missing features in snowflake
  • [ ]

@subodh1810
Copy link
Contributor

subodh1810 commented Jan 19, 2022

@subodh1810
Copy link
Contributor

We have decided to go ahead and release Snowflake in GA

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants