You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. I noticed a recent transient (ZTF19acssnul) is classified as a possible SN on TNS. But the difference flux of this source is negative (ie, the flux has gone down with respect to the reference image). These cases can be interesting, but are unlikely to be SNe. They can be removed by filtering on the isdiffpos parameters of the avro packets.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear Sjoert, thanks a lot for the information and sorry about this mistake. We were doing the final filtering by hand using isdiffpos as you suggest, but we made a mistake in this particular candidate. We have automated this for the problem not to repeat when submitting to TNS and we will exclude these candidates from the SN hunter tool as well.
Hi. I noticed a recent transient (ZTF19acssnul) is classified as a possible SN on TNS. But the difference flux of this source is negative (ie, the flux has gone down with respect to the reference image). These cases can be interesting, but are unlikely to be SNe. They can be removed by filtering on the
isdiffpos
parameters of the avro packets.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: