Improvements

[alex1yaremchuk]

Hi!

I'll put some of my thoughts here about further movement of this project.

Project's Autonomy

It was initially planned, that it would be autonomous, living on its own.
Breaks itself, then people fix it.

Improving collaborator's experience

I think it can be a bit frustrating for fresh developers as it is now:

1. ** Visual feedback** It doesn't have a published version which can be checked any time.
   (for now users can only run the "app" on their own)
   Need to add an html page on github.io
   so it states f.i. "1 + 2 = 5 (according to our API)".
   and when user fixes the issue then this page get's visibly improved.

2. Constant re-introduction of the issue (groundhog day).
   It might be a bit frustrating to see the bug reimplemented after you fixed it.
   I think it is an intrinsic feature and nothing can be done.
   Only other idea was a separate file for each contributor.

Other stuff

We could bring some other stuff, imitating real projects:

• commit message format validation with husky
• other languages

I definitely invite collaborators to participate and make this sandbox better.

[alex1yaremchuk]

I addressed the first issue mentioned above - now there is a "app" page showing the "add" function's results.

As for the second issue - I think it stays for now.

[alex1yaremchuk]

Other idea is a more elaborated merge process:

1. Add a review comment asking to change something.
2. Add a merge conflict so the user has to overcome it.

while I'm doing it manually, I could ask people if they wanted to have such "fun".