You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I strongly consider switching LLAMA to C++20 in the next months. There are currently no downstream users of LLAMA that depend on C++17. If you read this and you are one, or have serious concerns, please add a comment here!
The move is mainly motivated by me starting to write my PhD thesis on LLAMA in a few months. And when I sit down and take 6 months to write about LLAMA, I would like to do the best job possible. And with C++20, LLAMA is probably easier to understand and explain, because I could really write down what e.g. a "record reference" or a "proxy reference" or a "blob" is in actual syntax and not just words. Also, it seems like I can do all my benchmarks needed for my PhD with C++20.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I strongly consider switching LLAMA to C++20 in the next months. There are currently no downstream users of LLAMA that depend on C++17. If you read this and you are one, or have serious concerns, please add a comment here!
The move is mainly motivated by me starting to write my PhD thesis on LLAMA in a few months. And when I sit down and take 6 months to write about LLAMA, I would like to do the best job possible. And with C++20, LLAMA is probably easier to understand and explain, because I could really write down what e.g. a "record reference" or a "proxy reference" or a "blob" is in actual syntax and not just words. Also, it seems like I can do all my benchmarks needed for my PhD with C++20.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: