-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 328
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dragon Accessibility issue with DOB field #1101
Comments
For the benefit of others looking into this, you can see the Date Input component here: |
This is a general issue that Dragon doesn't play well with number fields. So, this is independent of the Design System as you can see in this reduced test case which uses basic unstyled number fields. Back then we tested with Dragon 12 and 13, and 13 was worse than 12 in that respect (and some others). I tested Dragon 15 a couple of days ago and found that this has improved a bit: Although it still doesn't work with IE11, it now works with Chrome. (I couldn't test in Firefox because their plugin is not compatible with Quantum.) |
Wonder if this would be helpful to add to the documentation for the date input in the design system? So people are aware of this limitation (I know it isn't strictly the component's issue but feels like it should be something we are all aware of) |
Thanks for raising this @alexnewmannn. I've just created an issue to add this to the Design System guidance. |
We could consider using |
Verified that this was fixed by #1700 using Dragon 15 with Internet Explorer 11 on Windows 10. I checked out and ran 5a3e771 and tried the following using the date input example:
When testing against the master branch (1d2fcb6) using the same example:
The same steps worked for the month and year. |
We've had a report from someone in the DWP accessibility team about Dragon users being unable to populate any of the 3 date fields, this has been reported in our prototype, another team's service and on the design system site itself.
The user was not able to do any dictation in these fields, but was fine with generic text fields and fields like sort code and account number. The user reported trouble navigating to the fields as they "are not labelled". The end result had to be using a "dictation box" which is designed for when a field will not accept text. It works but is tedious.
First thought was whether Dragon was seeing something strange about the "pattern" attribute which I'll have an investigate with.
Anyone had any experience with this or got any ideas?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: