-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 237
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unbranded template in examples does not include updated bodyEnd block #577
Comments
Hey David, Thanks for raising! Would you be willing to raise a pull request to fix the body end block issue? I'll chat to the team about the other two issues you mention and try and understand the reasoning. Thanks, Ollie |
Happy to, I don't have the relevant permissions to push my branch though, perhaps I need added to the team? |
We'd normally expect people to contribute to the Prototype Kit by making the changes on a fork of the repo – GitHub's documentation on this is pretty good at walking you through that. Let me know if I can help at all. |
Cheers, I thought I might be doing something wrong. Will do.
… On 14 Aug 2018, at 13:59, Oliver Byford ***@***.***> wrote:
We'd normally expect people to contribute to the Prototype Kit by making the changes on a fork of the repo – GitHub's documentation on this is pretty good at walking you through that.
Let me know if I can help at all.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
#580 added |
Template updated now |
Scripts do not run on unbranded pages due to bodyEnd block having not been updated to camel case.
should be
Also, is there a particular reason the unbranded template is not in the app/views directory by default? There also are no macro imports in this file, might be work keeping it in line with the template.html file.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: