Extensions for custom components with a ViewModel.
- Ext.vmx.mixin.Bindable
- Ext.vmx.app.SplitViewModel
Allows an outer component to bind to a component with own ViewModel. For instance, this is common when you extend from a Grid with a ViewModel inside.
Ext.define('MyGrid', {
extend: 'Ext.grid.Panel',
xtype: 'mygrid',
viewModel: {
}
});
Without the extension you aren't able to bind to it's selection from the outside (EXTJS-15503):
Ext.define('MyPanel', {
extend: 'Ext.panel.Panel',
viewModel: {
},
items: [{
xtype: 'mygrid',
reference: 'mygrid'
}, {
xtype: 'textfield',
fieldLabel: 'Selected record',
/*
Won't work because of the viewModel inside 'MyGrid'.
Use 'Ext.vmx.mixin.Bindable' to fix.
*/
bind: '{mygrid.selection.name}'
}]
});
Allows to make a bind between component's configuration properties and it's inner components:
Ext.define('MyGrid', {
extend: 'Ext.grid.Panel',
xtype: 'mygrid',
viewModel: {
},
config: {
readOnly: false
},
publishes: ['readOnly'],
tbar: [{
text: 'Add',
itemId: 'addButton',
bind: {
disabled: '{readOnly}'
}
}, {
text: 'Remove',
itemId: 'removeButton',
bind: {
disabled: '{readOnly}',
text: 'Remove {selection.name}'
}
}]
});
Full demo abailable at https://fiddle.sencha.com/#fiddle/1si5
No known issues. Backward compatible. Keep in mind Sencha's recommendations: Don't nest data objects more deeply than necessary.
Ext.application({
requires: [
'Ext.vmx.mixin.Bindable'
]
});
Allows you to:
- Define non-unique data field names among ViewModels
- Reference to a parent ViewModel from a child
This extension needs in a more detailed explanation. Imagine you have two components, one is nested into another. They both have ViewModels. And both of these ViewModels have a color
data field. You want to use configuration properties to control component's state. How would you bind the inner component's color
config to the outer component's color
? If you try, you would see that the binding doesn't work as far as names are not unique.
https://fiddle.sencha.com/#fiddle/1so5
Seems we have to use different names for ViewModels' data fields. E.g. innerColor
and outerColor
. Obviously this is not convinient and doesn't guaranee uniqueness.
So here is the SplitViewModel
extension that internally gives unique names to the data fields of a ViewModel. As the result ViewModels never interfere. To complete our example we are going to to make an explicit back-reference binding as shown:
Ext.define('Fiddle.view.OuterContainer', {
// ...
viewModel: {
name: 'outercontainer',
data: {
color: null
}
},
// ...
items: [{
xtype: 'innercontainer',
bind: {
color: '{outercontainer.color}'
}
}]
});
-
We gave a
name
to the outer ViewModel since it's anonymous (in the same file). Either way thename
would be taken from thealias
automatically, e.g.alias: 'viewmodel.outercontainer'
. -
We gave an explicit back-reference to the outer ViewModel:
color: '{outercontainer.color}'
Try it https://fiddle.sencha.com/#fiddle/1so9
ViewModels are now isolated from each other. Developers are able to create independent views using both ViewControllers and ViewModels with no worrying about the ViewModels interference. With this extension binding becomes similar to a circuit boar wiring. Very predictable.
If you had nested views both with ViewModels like in example above, then you must add an explicit back-reference to your bindings where necessary. Even if property names are unique. All you have to do is to prefix the binding expression with ViewModel's type
or name
.
Ext.application({
requires: [
'Ext.vmx.app.SplitViewModel'
]
});
You are going to have the best results with both extensions included. Take a look at this example
https://fiddle.sencha.com/#fiddle/1sod
There are no handlers. Everything is done with a declaration syntax. Component's state is controlled by configuration properties but the internals are bound via ViewModel. This is great. I wish Sencha would have done this by default.