Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comparisons to CARTO's raster processing toolkit #54

Open
alxmrs opened this issue Apr 13, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Comparisons to CARTO's raster processing toolkit #54

alxmrs opened this issue Apr 13, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@alxmrs
Copy link
Owner

alxmrs commented Apr 13, 2024

https://docs.carto.com/data-and-analysis/analytics-toolbox-for-bigquery/sql-reference/raster

https://carto.com/blog/cloud-native-raster-analysis-bigquery

It seems like this project and CARTO's advanced toolbox aim to solve similar problems. Some quick thoughts on differences:

  • Both want to give users the ability to join raster and vector data. CARTO focuses on geometry types (via DB operations), whereas we focus on points (letting geopandas, etc. handle geometry).
  • Here, we are storage system agnostic (Zarr, Xee, NetCDF, etc.; most likely in cloud storage) and let the DB operations happen at the application later (a batch dask job). CARTO involves data in a data lake (BQ; requires ingestion via raster-loader) as performs operations at the DB layer. One removes an ETL step, but the other gets the advantages of data locality and mature querying capabilities.
  • This is OSS and you have to roll your own implementation. The other is proprietary software, a batteries-included SaaS.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant