New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider removing WASM providers #216

Open

andrzejressel opened this issue Jul 8, 2024 · 0 comments

Labels

far future probably never

Owner

andrzejressel commented Jul 8, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Do we really need another indirection layer like wasm providers? Shouldn't generated code just directly call register?

Should be considered only after all feature of Pulumi are implemented.

Considering end goal is having users generating their own providers - this may not be a bad idea after all.

There may be issue with plugin version detection thought. I wonder if I can force some wasm attribute that will be available in runner.

andrzejressel added far future probably never labels

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment