Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

potential data biases #9

Open
auremoser opened this issue May 29, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

potential data biases #9

auremoser opened this issue May 29, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@auremoser
Copy link
Contributor

A interesting added feature could be functionality for exploring potential data biases of analytical datasets.

  • taxonomic biases (ie calculate taxonomic distinctness of subsets of complete case species for different variable combinations)
  • data gap biases
  • basic covariance structure between variables. Could be used to relate to data gaps to understand how missing values might affect results.
@annakrystalli
Copy link
Owner

annakrystalli commented Sep 18, 2016

What features, tools or functionality would be most helpful in probing your datasets and assessing for biases?

Missing data in trait databases is a persistent problem affecting analyses. The most common approach is to delete missing cases but this can introduce additional biases and reduce statistical power of analyses and affect model selection and inference.

In these cases imputation might be more appropriate and there are a number of approaches suggested, making use of both relationships between traits as well as taxonomic relationships.

proposed tools

taxonomic biases:

imputation:

Currently exploring use of missForest and Rphylopars to impute missing data. A framework for testing out different imputation approaches would probably work best.

Crossvalidated imputation error can also be used to assess contribution of individual to traits to overall imputation error.

Model/trait selection:

  • Can we develop a framework for assessing trait usability in analysis and guide variable selection? Ie establish a reasoning behind excluding traits on the grounds of biases in data availability?

Your input is needed!

Feel free to leave suggestions on formalising such a process, useful tools and approaches or get in touch if you have an idea for a feature to add.

@auremoser
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cool. I'd also add these resources:

Lots of these are for newsrooms but I thought they might be useful for everything.

@annakrystalli
Copy link
Owner

Thanks for these! Going to also add them to #10 as a lot refers to basic data quality checks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants