Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Report the number of allocated vs free IPs to status of the EgressIPPool? #2454

Closed
tnqn opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Report the number of allocated vs free IPs to status of the EgressIPPool? #2454

tnqn opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 4 comments
Assignees
@wenqiq
Labels
kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API.

Comments

@tnqn
Copy link
Member

tnqn commented Jul 23, 2021

This was a suggestion from @antoninbas.

I think it would make the ExternalIPPool API informative and should be straighfoward to implement.

Originally posted by @antoninbas in #2236 (comment)
@tnqn tnqn added the kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API. label Jul 23, 2021
@tnqn
Copy link
Member Author

tnqn commented Jul 23, 2021

Please let me know your opinion on this API change if any. @jianjuns @antoninbas @wenqiq @abhiraut

@abhiraut
Copy link
Contributor

i think this is a great idea.

@abhiraut abhiraut mentioned this issue Jul 23, 2021
Merged
@jianjuns
Copy link
Contributor

Sounds good to me.

@wenqiq wenqiq self-assigned this Jul 28, 2021
@wenqiq
Copy link
Contributor

wenqiq commented Jul 28, 2021

Good idea. I think I could implement this. Please assign this to me. Thanks

@wenqiq wenqiq mentioned this issue Jul 29, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@wenqiq wenqiq

Labels
kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@abhiraut @tnqn @wenqiq @jianjuns