Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Status of testing of Apache Airflow 2.8.2rc3 #37617

Closed
28 of 68 tasks
ephraimbuddy opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 25 comments
Closed
28 of 68 tasks

Status of testing of Apache Airflow 2.8.2rc3 #37617

ephraimbuddy opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 25 comments
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases

Comments

@ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor

ephraimbuddy commented Feb 22, 2024

Body

We are kindly requesting that contributors to Apache Airflow RC 2.8.2rc3 help test the RC.

Please let us know by commenting if the issue is addressed in the latest RC.

Thanks to all who contributed to the release (probably not a complete list!):
@devscheffer @kn3609571 @Joffreybvn @arovira @im-perativa @Taragolis @potiuk @bolkedebruin @ephraimbuddy @jedcunningham @patgarz @bbovenzi @Lee-W @SamWheating @koushik-rout-samsung @rawwar @raphaelauv @vlieven @maiconkkl @ByPort @vincbeck @amoghrajesh @Adaverse @dstandish @csp33 @jkramer-ginkgo @ckljohn @jsgh7276 @ashb @anteverse @Rurushu13 @sktemkar16 @aru-trackunit @tobiaszorzetto @jscheffl @avkirilishin @barrysteyn @Felix-neko @matejmurin01 @andylamp @hterik @Narendra-Neerukonda @Tenzer @aritra24 @hussein-awala @vchiapaikeo @charleschang0531 @Satoshi-Sh @ryandutton

Committer

  • I acknowledge that I am a maintainer/committer of the Apache Airflow project.
@ephraimbuddy ephraimbuddy added the kind:meta High-level information important to the community label Feb 22, 2024
@patgarz
Copy link
Contributor

patgarz commented Feb 22, 2024

#37395 confirmed

@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor

#37063 confirmed.

But I was expecting #37497 also be in 2.8.2 but I miss this in the RC. Mistake or by intend? (then milestone label is not correct)

@andylamp
Copy link
Contributor

#32867 seems to work as expected.

@vchiapaikeo
Copy link
Contributor

#37527 is fine

@Satoshi-Sh
Copy link
Contributor

#37285 confirmed.

@Satoshi-Sh
Copy link
Contributor

In case, someone doesn't not know how to run this version. (I asked Yarek how to do it.)

https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/dev/README_RELEASE_AIRFLOW.md#verify-the-release-candidate-by-contributors

@amoghrajesh
Copy link
Contributor

Tested my changes

@ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tested my changes

@amoghrajesh , the #37501 was cherry-picked differently by @potiuk so it works in 2.8.2 without the provider, you can test it. Please check that the fix works. The same applies to the related PRs.

#36804 is not a blocker. It's minor

@eladkal eladkal added the testing status Status of testing releases label Feb 23, 2024
@Lee-W
Copy link
Member

Lee-W commented Feb 23, 2024

#37002 confirmed

@amoghrajesh
Copy link
Contributor

amoghrajesh commented Feb 23, 2024

@ephraimbuddy Fresh installed the RC again and tested my changes after resetting the DB.

Btw, this was also cherry picked: #37507 and it works as expected.

@aritra24
Copy link
Collaborator

#36692: Confirmed, works as expected now.

@anteverse
Copy link
Contributor

#36855

Tested with 3.11, 3.10, 3.9 & 3.8. Works like a charm.

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 23, 2024

Tested and marked all mine (and few others). Checked that release process works now well without flaws (#37633) - found a few small things to correct in verification process - but they are irrelvant for the relase #37656

All looks good!

@kn3609571
Copy link
Contributor

#36538 (related to #36437, #36343) seems to work as expected.

@im-perativa
Copy link
Contributor

#36855 and #36941 Confirmed 🚀

@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor

#37063 confirmed.

But I was expecting #37497 also be in 2.8.2 but I miss this in the RC. Mistake or by intend? (then milestone label is not correct)

Tested and all PRs labelled are not correctly in RC2 - but found (late) a small UI regression. Created PR #37672 as a fix.

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 24, 2024

I guess "are not correctly in RC2" -> "are now correctly" in RC2 :) ?

I guess the regression is small enough to not require RC3?

@potiuk potiuk changed the title Status of testing of Apache Airflow 2.8.2rc1 Status of testing of Apache Airflow 2.8.2rc3 Feb 24, 2024
@jscheffl
Copy link
Contributor

Tested RC3 now and can confirm all stuff is working (wohooo), also #37675

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 24, 2024

Tested rc3 - looks good. Also tested that Docker Image for rc3 contains latest docker binary (added in #37651 )

@vatsrahul1001
Copy link
Collaborator

Tested RC3, LGTM :)
Below is the list of items I have tested:

  1. Tested Regression DAG with Celery and k8s executor.
  2. Tested issue 37497 372027 37254 37205
  3. UI sanity.

@jsgh7276
Copy link

Tested issue 37497 and worked as I expected!
Thanks a lot to @jscheffl and all related contributors.

@Lee-W
Copy link
Member

Lee-W commented Feb 26, 2024

#37002 confirmed on rc3

@ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

ephraimbuddy commented Feb 26, 2024

Apache Airflow 2.8.2 has been released. Thank you all for testing this release

@potiuk
Copy link
Member

potiuk commented Feb 26, 2024

2.8.2 to be precise :) . From RC3

@ephraimbuddy
Copy link
Contributor Author

2.8.2 to be precise :) . From RC3

Ah, mistake. Correcting that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind:meta High-level information important to the community testing status Status of testing releases
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests