Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Proposal]: Alarm Mechanism #822

Closed
1 of 5 tasks
LiteSun opened this issue Nov 18, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed
1 of 5 tasks

[Proposal]: Alarm Mechanism #822

LiteSun opened this issue Nov 18, 2020 · 6 comments
Labels

Comments

@LiteSun
Copy link
Member

LiteSun commented Nov 18, 2020

Please answer these questions before submitting your issue.

  • Why do you submit this issue?
  • Question or discussion
  • Bug
  • Requirements
  • Feature or performance improvement
  • Other

Requirements or improvement

Why

To allow users to see anomalies in the system. I propose that we need to add an alarm module, and for now consider the alarm on the route

How

Front-End

  1. An alarm configuration page needs to be added.
    The page needs to include the following fields (temporary)
    • Severity: High, Medium, Low, Ignore
    • Event Type:All event types、Status Code、Traffic、Latency、Unknown Parameters、Abnormal Values、Value Type
    • HTTP Methods
  2. Alarm list page

Back-end

  1. Need a field data interface to receive front-end pages.
  2. Need a list interface to display alert messages.

APISIX

Not sure if APISIX needs to be changed.

@juzhiyuan
Copy link
Member

@juzhiyuan juzhiyuan added the wait for update 1. Solution 2. Due date 3. Assignees if needed label Nov 24, 2020
@membphis
Copy link
Member

This feature can be implemented in grafana.

https://grafana.com/docs/grafana/latest/alerting/create-alerts/

@nic-chen
Copy link
Member

I prefer to use grafana too

@juzhiyuan juzhiyuan removed the wait for update 1. Solution 2. Due date 3. Assignees if needed label Nov 26, 2020
@juzhiyuan
Copy link
Member

Just to make sure, do you mean we don't need to implement this feature, just use Grafana is ok?

@membphis
Copy link
Member

Just to make sure, do you mean we don't need to implement this feature, just use Grafana is ok?

I think this is enough

@juzhiyuan
Copy link
Member

fine, then we could close this issue now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants