GH-40668: [Ruby][CI] Require GLib 2.58 or later for timezone #40669
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@github-actions crossbow submit verify-rc-source-ruby-linux-almalinux-8-amd64 |
|
|
github-actions
bot
added
Component: Ruby
awaiting committer review
|
Revision: 45f8134 Submitted crossbow builds: ursacomputing/crossbow @ actions-71da236023
|
|
+1 |
|
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 5 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 4cce720. There were no benchmark performance regressions. 🎉 The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 13 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rationale for this change
GLib 2.58 or later is required for
TimestampDataType's timezone support.What changes are included in this PR?
Check GLib version.
Are these changes tested?
Yes.
Are there any user-facing changes?
No.